linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.flynn@hammerspace.com
Subject: Re: parts of pages on NFS being replaced by swaths of NULs
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:38:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKTEsmOAXsHEGEEz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKD3SFcyCnb8snst@kernel.org>

On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 05:25:28PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 07:51:17AM -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > 
> > That's not sufficient AFAICS. Does the following patch work?
> > 
> > 8<------------------------------------------------------------
> > From fc9690dda01f001c6cd11665701394da8ebba1ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Message-ID: <fc9690dda01f001c6cd11665701394da8ebba1ab.1755355810.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:25:20 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] NFS: Fix a race when updating an existing write
> > 
> > After nfs_lock_and_join_requests() tests for whether the request is
> > still attached to the mapping, nothing prevents a call to
> > nfs_inode_remove_request() from succeeding until we actually lock the
> > page group.
> > The reason is that whoever called nfs_inode_remove_request() doesn't
> > necessarily have a lock on the page group head.
> > 
> > So in order to avoid races, let's take the page group lock earlier in
> > nfs_lock_and_join_requests(), and hold it across the removal of the
> > request in nfs_inode_remove_request().
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > Fixes: c3f2235782c3 ("nfs: fold nfs_folio_find_and_lock_request into nfs_lock_and_join_requests")
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfs/pagelist.c        |  9 +++++----
> >  fs/nfs/write.c           | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> >  include/linux/nfs_page.h |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > index 11968dcb7243..6e69ce43a13f 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > @@ -253,13 +253,14 @@ nfs_page_group_unlock(struct nfs_page *req)
> >  	nfs_page_clear_headlock(req);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked
> > +/**
> > + * nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked - Test if all requests have @bit set
> > + * @req: request in page group
> > + * @bit: PG_* bit that is used to sync page group
> >   *
> >   * must be called with page group lock held
> >   */
> > -static bool
> > -nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked(struct nfs_page *req, unsigned int bit)
> > +bool nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked(struct nfs_page *req, unsigned int bit)
> >  {
> >  	struct nfs_page *head = req->wb_head;
> >  	struct nfs_page *tmp;
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > index fa5c41d0989a..8b7c04737967 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > @@ -153,20 +153,10 @@ nfs_page_set_inode_ref(struct nfs_page *req, struct inode *inode)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int
> > -nfs_cancel_remove_inode(struct nfs_page *req, struct inode *inode)
> > +static void nfs_cancel_remove_inode(struct nfs_page *req, struct inode *inode)
> >  {
> > -	int ret;
> > -
> > -	if (!test_bit(PG_REMOVE, &req->wb_flags))
> > -		return 0;
> > -	ret = nfs_page_group_lock(req);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> >  	if (test_and_clear_bit(PG_REMOVE, &req->wb_flags))
> >  		nfs_page_set_inode_ref(req, inode);
> > -	nfs_page_group_unlock(req);
> > -	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -585,19 +575,18 @@ static struct nfs_page *nfs_lock_and_join_requests(struct folio *folio)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	ret = nfs_page_group_lock(head);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +
> >  	/* Ensure that nobody removed the request before we locked it */
> >  	if (head != folio->private) {
> > +		nfs_page_group_unlock(head);
> >  		nfs_unlock_and_release_request(head);
> >  		goto retry;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ret = nfs_cancel_remove_inode(head, inode);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		goto out_unlock;
> > -
> > -	ret = nfs_page_group_lock(head);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		goto out_unlock;
> > +	nfs_cancel_remove_inode(head, inode);
> >  
> >  	/* lock each request in the page group */
> >  	for (subreq = head->wb_this_page;
> > @@ -786,7 +775,8 @@ static void nfs_inode_remove_request(struct nfs_page *req)
> >  {
> >  	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(nfs_page_to_inode(req));
> >  
> > -	if (nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit(req, PG_REMOVE)) {
> > +	nfs_page_group_lock(req);
> > +	if (nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked(req, PG_REMOVE)) {
> >  		struct folio *folio = nfs_page_to_folio(req->wb_head);
> >  		struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping;
> >  
> > @@ -798,6 +788,7 @@ static void nfs_inode_remove_request(struct nfs_page *req)
> >  		}
> >  		spin_unlock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
> >  	}
> > +	nfs_page_group_unlock(req);
> >  
> >  	if (test_and_clear_bit(PG_INODE_REF, &req->wb_flags)) {
> >  		atomic_long_dec(&nfsi->nrequests);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_page.h b/include/linux/nfs_page.h
> > index 169b4ae30ff4..9aed39abc94b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/nfs_page.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/nfs_page.h
> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ extern void nfs_join_page_group(struct nfs_page *head,
> >  extern int nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *);
> >  extern void nfs_page_group_unlock(struct nfs_page *);
> >  extern bool nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit(struct nfs_page *, unsigned int);
> > +extern bool nfs_page_group_sync_on_bit_locked(struct nfs_page *, unsigned int);
> >  extern	int nfs_page_set_headlock(struct nfs_page *req);
> >  extern void nfs_page_clear_headlock(struct nfs_page *req);
> >  extern bool nfs_async_iocounter_wait(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_lock_context *);
> > -- 
> > 2.50.1
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Trond,
> 
> You're the best! ;)
> 
> Your patch fixes corruption I've been chasing for the past week
> relative to NFS DIRECT, specifically with:
> echo Y > /sys/module/nfs/parameters/localio_O_DIRECT_align_misaligned_IO
> 
> So you need my latest NFS DIRECT patchset:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250815233003.55071-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
> 
> With it, writes would be corrupted when using the attached reproducer
> (from Jon Flynn, with the assistance of ChatGPT) that pulls out the
> subset of MLperf unet3d test (when ran in buffered IO mode, so
> entirely misaligned relative to DIO-alignment requirements) that we've
> seen npz CRC compare failure with.
> 
> I tested my patchset with your patch applied and it all "just works".
> 
> Ship it all!
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> ps. running the attached reproducer is as simple as:
> ./mlperf_npz_tool.py --npz-path /mnt/share1/sample_a.npz

So even with this patch there is something still causing data
corruption on much faster systems.  This mlperf_npz_tool.py reproducer
works fine on a slower VMware based testbed, but once I load the same
kernel (with Trond's fix applied) on a very fast baremetal system I
still see CRC mismatch due to write corruption if
localio_O_DIRECT_align_misaligned_IO=Y (from my NFS DIRECT patchset).

Again, both of my latest NFSD DIRECT and NFS DIRECT patchsets are
applied:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250815144607.50967-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250815233003.55071-1-snitzer@kernel.org/

And I'm hacking nfs4 to impose O_DIRECT on buffered IO (reproducer
doesn't open its files with O_DIRECT but NFS client acts like it did).
I can dig out the patch to achieve that if others are interested.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-19 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-30 14:52 parts of pages on NFS being replaced by swaths of NULs Jeff Layton
2025-07-31 21:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-07-31 23:04   ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-06 14:20   ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-12 11:58   ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-12 16:58     ` Trond Myklebust
2025-08-12 17:20       ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-16 13:01       ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-16 14:51         ` Trond Myklebust
2025-08-16 15:31           ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-16 17:16           ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-16 21:25           ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-19 18:38             ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2025-08-19 20:13               ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-19 21:38                 ` seeing CRC mismatch with NFS DIRECT WRITE when localio_O_DIRECT_align_misaligned_IO=Y Mike Snitzer
2025-08-19 21:50                   ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-19 17:10           ` parts of pages on NFS being replaced by swaths of NULs Jeff Layton
2025-08-19 18:28             ` Trond Myklebust
2025-08-19 19:48               ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-19 20:47                 ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKTEsmOAXsHEGEEz@kernel.org \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.flynn@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).