linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] svcrdma: Mark Read chunks
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:25:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPlL0_fIfGwNbZBF@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022192208.1682-6-cel@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> 
> The upper layer may want to know when the receive buffer's .pages
> array is guaranteed to contain only an opaque payload. This permits
> the upper layer to optimize its buffer handling.
> 
> NB: Since svc_rdma_recvfrom.c is under net/, we use the comment
> style that is preferred in the networking layer.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
> index e7e4a39ca6c6..b1a0c72f73de 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,11 @@ static void svc_rdma_read_complete_one(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>  	buf->page_len = length;
>  	buf->len += length;
>  	buf->buflen += length;
> +
> +	/* Transport guarantees that only the chunk payload
> +	 * appears in buf->pages.
> +	 */
> +	buf->flags |= XDRBUF_READ;
>  }
>  
>  /* Finish constructing the RPC Call message in rqstp::rq_arg.
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
> 

This patch header leaves me unclear on your thinking for upper layer
optimization that would look for XDRBUF_READ.

I see rpcrdma_marshal_req() is checking XDRBUF_READ but...

I'm left hoping for a clearer payoff on this change's benefit (and
relation to the rest of the patchset).

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-22 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-22 19:22 [PATCH v6 0/5] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] NFSD: Enable return of an updated stable_how to NFS clients Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] NFSD: Refactor nfsd_vfs_write() Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 19:27   ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 21:09     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-10-22 20:58   ` Mike Snitzer
2025-10-22 21:09     ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-23 19:37   ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-23 21:23     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-10-24 14:24       ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-24 18:30         ` Mike Snitzer
2025-10-22 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] svcrdma: Mark Read chunks Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 21:25   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2025-10-23 13:00     ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPlL0_fIfGwNbZBF@kernel.org \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).