From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:39:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <ae2fa56f38f87da3a90ab6fe39954b2b.squirrel@webmail.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	"Linux Containers" <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Linux Containers" <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>,
	"Cedric Le Goater" <clg-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Matt Helsley" <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no ([129.240.10.57]:53787 "EHLO mail-out1.uio.no"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753386AbZAGAqg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:46:36 -0500
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal
namespace.

You have yet to explain why.