Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: fix overlapping extents returned for pNFS LAYOUTGET
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 04:50:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agcIm53ZQ8-P7dX6@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06d9b1ae-e46f-459c-bcb4-1a5ca4ded4b0@oracle.com>

On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:28:31AM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
> After reviewing ext_tree_insert(), with assist from Codex, I think this
> function handles overlapping extents properly. The only issue I see in
> ext_tree_insert() is the accuracy of the return error code, EINVAL instead
> of ENOMEM, when kmemdup() fails.
> 
> Since ext_tree_insert seems to handle overlapping extents fine, do you
> think it's worth it to fix xfs_fs_map_blocks() to avoid returning overlap
> extents?

Oh, we absolutely should not return overlapping extents of the same
class.  So the bug fix itself is good, I was just hoping we could also
improve the sanity checking on the client side.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 17:21 [PATCH 1/1] xfs: fix overlapping extents returned for pNFS LAYOUTGET Dai Ngo
2026-05-12 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-12 19:21   ` Dai Ngo
2026-05-13  7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-13 15:50   ` Dai Ngo
2026-05-13 17:28     ` Dai Ngo
2026-05-14  0:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-14 17:19         ` Dai Ngo
2026-05-14 17:49           ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-15 21:39           ` Dave Chinner
2026-05-16  2:14             ` Dai Ngo
2026-05-15 11:50       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-15 11:49     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agcIm53ZQ8-P7dX6@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox