Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ameer Hamza <ameer.hamza@truenas.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: cel@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, okorniev@redhat.com,
	 Dai.Ngo@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.motin@truenas.com,
	caleb.stjohn@truenas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sunrpc: don't strip a uid's groups when the mountd group lookup fails
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 17:31:47 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoBb18TpdIe77NOI@hamza-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b34e782725fed9a661a4c77ab875f1bd755fcd8.camel@kernel.org>

On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 06:50:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 03:19 +0500, Ameer Hamza wrote:
> > On a server running rpc.mountd with --manage-gids, a transient
> > name-service failure makes mountd answer the auth.unix.gid upcall
> > with a zero-group reply, which the kernel installs as a valid
> > positive entry.  Patch 1 records such replies as negative entries
> > on the classic /proc channel, so the credential keeps the groups
> > it already carries.  Patch 2 does the same for the netlink upcall,
> > which has an explicit NEGATIVE flag the parser does not propagate.
> > 
> > One observation from reviewing the netlink path: in steady-state
> > netlink-only operation, mountd currently receives no unix_gid
> > upcalls, because unix_gid_upcall() still gates request generation
> > on cache_listeners_exist(), which counts only classic-channel
> > writers, and netlink-mode mountd opens no /proc channels.  A
> > flagged reply reaches the parser today only via the 30-second
> > post-close grace window, a concurrent classic-channel writer, or
> > a direct SUNRPC_CMD_UNIX_GID_SET_REQS.  Patch 2 fixes the parser
> > semantics ahead of that; making upcall generation netlink-aware
> > needs a per-cache listener signal (mountd subscribes to the
> > notification group even without --manage-gids) and is left for a
> > separate, runtime-tested series.
> > 
> 
> Do you intend to send the separate series for this?

Not at the moment. I may take a look later if it is still open.

Thanks for the review.

> 
> > Patch 1 was tested on a live 6.12 server over NFSv3 and v4.0-v4.2
> > with sec=sys and sec=krb5, and applies unmodified to every
> > maintained stable tree, 5.10.y through 7.1.y.  Patch 2 is build-
> > and static-checked (sparse, W=1) but not runtime-tested.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > - split the netlink fix into its own patch with its own Fixes:
> >   tag, as requested by Chuck
> > - patch 1 is unchanged
> > 
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20260814172507.1474519-1-ameer.hamza@truenas.com/
> > 
> > Ameer Hamza (2):
> >   sunrpc: treat empty auth.unix.gid replies as negative entries
> >   sunrpc: honor the netlink unix_gid NEGATIVE flag
> > 
> >  net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: 46db3c8a1be96a354758b44b1d4fbb4b70d09a20
> 
> Good catch. Both of these look good to me.
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-15 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 22:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] sunrpc: don't strip a uid's groups when the mountd group lookup fails Ameer Hamza
2026-08-14 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sunrpc: treat empty auth.unix.gid replies as negative entries Ameer Hamza
2026-08-14 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sunrpc: honor the netlink unix_gid NEGATIVE flag Ameer Hamza
2026-08-15 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sunrpc: don't strip a uid's groups when the mountd group lookup fails Jeff Layton
2026-08-15 12:31   ` Ameer Hamza [this message]
2026-08-15 16:24 ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aoBb18TpdIe77NOI@hamza-PC \
    --to=ameer.hamza@truenas.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.motin@truenas.com \
    --cc=caleb.stjohn@truenas.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox