From: dai.ngo@oracle.com
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, chuck.lever@oracle.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] NFSD: fix WARN_ON_ONCE in __queue_delayed_work
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:36:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b46a0da0-e10d-b27f-e17c-907f452a306c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <956fe608b456141b1b43f9dfe65581f168247cb8.camel@kernel.org>
On 1/11/23 2:47 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 02:24 -0800, Dai Ngo wrote:
>> Currently nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker can be schduled multiple times
>> from nfsd4_state_shrinker_count when memory is low. This causes
>> the WARN_ON_ONCE in __queue_delayed_work to trigger.
>>
>> This patch allows only one instance of nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker
>> at a time using the nfsd_shrinker_active flag, protected by the
>> client_lock.
>>
>> Change nfsd_shrinker_work from delayed_work to work_struct since we
>> don't use the delay.
>>
>> Replace mod_delayed_work in nfsd4_state_shrinker_count with queue_work.
>>
>> Cancel work_struct nfsd_shrinker_work after unregistering shrinker
>> in nfs4_state_shutdown_net
>>
>> Fixes: 44df6f439a17 ("NFSD: add delegation reaper to react to low memory condition")
>> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> . Change nfsd_shrinker_work from delayed_work to work_struct
>> . Replace mod_delayed_work in nfsd4_state_shrinker_count with queue_work
>> . Cancel work_struct nfsd_shrinker_work after unregistering shrinker
>> v3:
>> . set nfsd_shrinker_active earlier in nfsd4_state_shrinker_count
>>
>> fs/nfsd/netns.h | 3 ++-
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/netns.h b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
>> index 8c854ba3285b..b0c7b657324b 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/netns.h
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
>> @@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ struct nfsd_net {
>>
>> atomic_t nfsd_courtesy_clients;
>> struct shrinker nfsd_client_shrinker;
>> - struct delayed_work nfsd_shrinker_work;
>> + struct work_struct nfsd_shrinker_work;
>> + bool nfsd_shrinker_active;
>> };
>>
>> /* Simple check to find out if a given net was properly initialized */
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index a7cfefd7c205..35ec4cba88b3 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -4407,11 +4407,22 @@ nfsd4_state_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(shrink,
>> struct nfsd_net, nfsd_client_shrinker);
>>
>> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
>> + if (nn->nfsd_shrinker_active) {
>> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + nn->nfsd_shrinker_active = true;
>> count = atomic_read(&nn->nfsd_courtesy_clients);
>> if (!count)
>> count = atomic_long_read(&num_delegations);
>> - if (count)
>> - mod_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->nfsd_shrinker_work, 0);
>> + if (count) {
>> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
>> + queue_work(laundry_wq, &nn->nfsd_shrinker_work);
>> + } else {
>> + nn->nfsd_shrinker_active = false;
>> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
>> + }
> The change to normal work_struct is an improvement, but NAK on this
> patch. The spinlocking and flag are not needed here. I seriously doubt
> that we have a clear understanding of this problem.
Agreed. We need to get to the bottom of this.
-Dai
>
>> return (unsigned long)count;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -6233,12 +6244,14 @@ deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn)
>> static void
>> nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> - struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
>> - struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(dwork, struct nfsd_net,
>> + struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(work, struct nfsd_net,
>> nfsd_shrinker_work);
>>
>> courtesy_client_reaper(nn);
>> deleg_reaper(nn);
>> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
>> + nn->nfsd_shrinker_active = false;
>> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
>> }
>>
>> static inline __be32 nfs4_check_fh(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct nfs4_stid *stp)
>> @@ -8064,7 +8077,7 @@ static int nfs4_state_create_net(struct net *net)
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->blocked_locks_lru);
>>
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&nn->laundromat_work, laundromat_main);
>> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work, nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker);
>> + INIT_WORK(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work, nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker);
>> get_net(net);
>>
>> nn->nfsd_client_shrinker.scan_objects = nfsd4_state_shrinker_scan;
>> @@ -8171,6 +8184,7 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
>> struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
>>
>> unregister_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_client_shrinker);
>> + cancel_work(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work);
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&nn->laundromat_work);
>> locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 10:24 [PATCH v3 1/1] NFSD: fix WARN_ON_ONCE in __queue_delayed_work Dai Ngo
2023-01-11 10:47 ` Jeff Layton
2023-01-11 11:36 ` dai.ngo [this message]
2023-01-11 11:01 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b46a0da0-e10d-b27f-e17c-907f452a306c@oracle.com \
--to=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox