From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: provide locking for v4_end_grace
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2025 07:15:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7f95cbb80beb07dac509ab29ffd23411d1e1a03.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250704072332.3278129-2-neil@brown.name>
On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 17:20 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Writing to v4_end_grace can race with server shutdown and result in
> memory being accessed after it was freed - reclaim_str_hashtbl in
> particular.
>
> We cannot hold nfsd_mutex across the nfsd4_end_grace() call as that is
> held while client_tracking_op->init() is called and that can wait for
> an upcall to nfsdcltrack which can write to v4_end_grace, resulting in a
> deadlock.
>
> nfsd4_end_grace() is also called by the landromat work queue and this
> doesn't require locking as server shutdown will stop the work and wait
> for it before freeing anything that nfsd4_end_grace() might access.
>
> However, we must be sure that writing to v4_end_grace doesn't restart
> the work item after shutdown has already waited for it. For this we add
> a new flag protected with a spin_lock, and nn->client_lock is suitable.
> It is set only while it is safe to make client tracking calls, and
> v4_end_grace only schedules work while the flag is set and with the
> spin_lock held.
>
> So this patch adds an nfsd_net field "client_tracking_active" which is
> set as described. Another field "grace_end_forced", is set when
> v4_end_grace is written. After this is set, and providing
> client_tracking_active is set, the laundromat is scheduled.
> This "grace_end_forced" field bypasses other checks for whether the
> grace period has finished.
>
> This resolves a race which can result in use-after-free.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250513074305.3362209-1-lilingfeng3@huawei.com
> Fixes: 7f5ef2e900d9 ("nfsd: add a v4_end_grace file to /proc/fs/nfsd")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/netns.h | 2 ++
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 6 +++---
> fs/nfsd/state.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/netns.h b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> index 3e2d0fde80a7..fe8338735e7c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ struct nfsd_net {
>
> struct lock_manager nfsd4_manager;
> bool grace_ended;
> + bool grace_end_forced;
> + bool client_tracking_active;
ISTM that the client_tracking_active bool is set and cleared similarly
to the nn->client_tracking_ops pointer itself. It _might_ be possible
to eliminate this bool and just use that pointer instead, though they
are not exactly cleared at the same time.
> time64_t boot_time;
>
> struct dentry *nfsd_client_dir;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index d5694987f86f..124fe4f669aa 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static u64 current_sessionid = 1;
> /* forward declarations */
> static bool check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner);
> static void nfs4_free_ol_stateid(struct nfs4_stid *stid);
> -void nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn);
> +static void nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn);
> static void _free_cpntf_state_locked(struct nfsd_net *nn, struct nfs4_cpntf_state *cps);
> static void nfsd4_file_hash_remove(struct nfs4_file *fi);
> static void deleg_reaper(struct nfsd_net *nn);
> @@ -6458,7 +6458,7 @@ nfsd4_renew(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> return nfs_ok;
> }
>
> -void
> +static void
> nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> {
> /* do nothing if grace period already ended */
> @@ -6491,6 +6491,36 @@ nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> */
> }
>
> +/**
> + * nfsd4_force_end_grace - forcibly end the grace period
> + * @nn: nfsd_net in which the grace period must end.
> + *
> + *
> + * An nfsv4 grace period can be terminated early if it is known that
> + * no more client could reclaim state. Sometimes user-space can provide
> + * that information - which will potentially be provided asychnronously
> + * w.r.t. server startup or shutdown.
> + *
> + * nfsd4_force_end_grace() causing the grace period to end and takes
> + * care to ensure races with server start/stop are not problematic.
> + *
> + * Return value: %false if the NFS server was not active and
> + * %true if the server was, or may have been, active.
> + */
> +bool
> +nfsd4_force_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> +{
> + if (!nn->client_tracking_ops)
> + return false;
> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> + if (nn->client_tracking_active) {
> + nn->grace_end_forced = true;
> + mod_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, 0);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If we've waited a lease period but there are still clients trying to
> * reclaim, wait a little longer to give them a chance to finish.
> @@ -6500,6 +6530,8 @@ static bool clients_still_reclaiming(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> time64_t double_grace_period_end = nn->boot_time +
> 2 * nn->nfsd4_lease;
>
> + if (nn->grace_end_forced)
> + return false;
> if (nn->track_reclaim_completes &&
> atomic_read(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete) ==
> nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size)
> @@ -8807,6 +8839,8 @@ static int nfs4_state_create_net(struct net *net)
> nn->unconf_name_tree = RB_ROOT;
> nn->boot_time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
> nn->grace_ended = false;
> + nn->grace_end_forced = false;
> + nn->client_tracking_active = false;
> nn->nfsd4_manager.block_opens = true;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->nfsd4_manager.list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->client_lru);
> @@ -8887,6 +8921,10 @@ nfs4_state_start_net(struct net *net)
> return ret;
> locks_start_grace(net, &nn->nfsd4_manager);
> nfsd4_client_tracking_init(net);
> + /* safe for laundromat to run now */
> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> + nn->client_tracking_active = true;
> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
> if (nn->track_reclaim_completes && nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size == 0)
> goto skip_grace;
> printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: starting %lld-second grace period (net %x)\n",
> @@ -8935,6 +8973,9 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
>
> shrinker_free(nn->nfsd_client_shrinker);
> cancel_work_sync(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work);
> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> + nn->client_tracking_active = false;
> + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock);
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&nn->laundromat_work);
> locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> index 3f3e9f6c4250..658f3f86a59f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> @@ -1082,10 +1082,10 @@ static ssize_t write_v4_end_grace(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size)
> case 'Y':
> case 'y':
> case '1':
> - if (!nn->nfsd_serv)
> - return -EBUSY;
> trace_nfsd_end_grace(netns(file));
> - nfsd4_end_grace(nn);
> + if (!nfsd4_force_end_grace(nn))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> index 1995bca158b8..05eabc69de40 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static inline void nfsd4_revoke_states(struct net *net, struct super_block *sb)
> #endif
>
> /* grace period management */
> -void nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn);
> +bool nfsd4_force_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn);
>
> /* nfs4recover operations */
> extern int nfsd4_client_tracking_init(struct net *net);
The patch itself and the new bool are fine though.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-05 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 7:20 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: provide locking for v4_end_grace NeilBrown
2025-07-04 7:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] " NeilBrown
2025-07-05 11:15 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-07-06 5:56 ` NeilBrown
2025-07-04 7:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: discard client_tracking_active and instead disable laundromat_work NeilBrown
2025-07-04 15:10 ` Chuck Lever
2025-07-04 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2025-07-05 11:20 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7f95cbb80beb07dac509ab29ffd23411d1e1a03.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=lilingfeng3@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox