From: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Subject: Re: nfs: avoid i_lock contention in nfs_clear_invalid_mapping
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:51:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bedccb42-4e8a-4b9c-a0d4-982abb7a318e@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxLVDC_C2CrWvXT7@kernel.org>
Hi Mike,
On 10/18/24 5:37 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:50PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 13:03 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>>> Multi-threaded buffered reads to the same file exposed significant
>>>> inode spinlock contention in nfs_clear_invalid_mapping().
>>>>
>>>> Eliminate this spinlock contention by checking flags without locking,
>>>> instead using smp_rmb and smp_load_acquire accordingly, but then take
>>>> spinlock and double-check these inode flags.
>>>>
>>>> Also refactor nfs_set_cache_invalid() slightly to use
>>>> smp_store_release() to pair with nfs_clear_invalid_mapping()'s
>>>> smp_load_acquire().
>>>>
>>>> While this fix is beneficial for all multi-threaded buffered reads
>>>> issued by an NFS client, this issue was identified in the context of
>>>> surprisingly low LOCALIO performance with 4K multi-threaded buffered
>>>> read IO. This fix dramatically speeds up LOCALIO performance:
>>>>
>>>> before: read: IOPS=1583k, BW=6182MiB/s (6482MB/s)(121GiB/20002msec)
>>>> after: read: IOPS=3046k, BW=11.6GiB/s (12.5GB/s)(232GiB/20001msec)
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 17dfeb911339 ("NFS: Fix races in nfs_revalidate_mapping")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/nfs/inode.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
>>>> index 542c7d97b235..130d7226b12a 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
>>>> @@ -205,12 +205,14 @@ void nfs_set_cache_invalid(struct inode *inode, unsigned long flags)
>>>> nfs_fscache_invalidate(inode, 0);
>>>> flags &= ~NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED;
>>>>
>>>> - nfsi->cache_validity |= flags;
>>>> + if (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0)
>>>> + flags &= ~NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
>>>>
>>>> - if (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0) {
>>>> - nfsi->cache_validity &= ~NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
>>>> - nfs_ooo_clear(nfsi);
>>>> - } else if (nfsi->cache_validity & NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA) {
>>>> + /* pairs with nfs_clear_invalid_mapping()'s smp_load_acquire() */
>>>> + smp_store_release(&nfsi->cache_validity, flags);
>>>> +
>>>
I'm having some issues with non-localio NFS after applying this patch:
- cthon basic tests fail with NFS v3
- cthon general tests fail with NFS v4.1 and v4.2
- xfstests generic/080, generic/472, generic/615, and generic/633 fail with NFS v4.1 and v4.2
- xfstests generic/683, and generic/684 fail with NFS v4.2
I think the problem is the call to smp_store_release(). It's overwriting nfsi->cache_validity
with the value of 'flags', losing anything set there but not in 'flags'. Could we instead do
something like:
smp_store_release(&nfsi->cache_validity, nfsi->cache_validity | flags)
?
Anna
>>> I don't know this code that well, but it used to do an |= of flags into
>>> cache_validity. Now you're replacing cache_validity wholesale with
>>> flags. Maybe that should do something like this?
>>>
>>> flags |= nfsi->cache_validity;
>>> smp_store_release(&nfsi->cache_validity, flags);
>>
>> Ah good catch, sorry about that, will fix.
>>
>> This will allow further cleanup too, will let v2 speak to that.
>
> I just posted v2, but for completeness: I decided to leave well enough
> alone and not do any further cleanup.
>
> (my thinking was relative to nfs_ooo_clear, and possibly moving it
> before the smp_store_release, so that nfsi->cache_validity only
> changed once using smp_store_release. The interlock between
> nfs_set_cache_invalid and nfs_clear_invalid_mapping is focused on
> NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA, which nfs_ooo_clear doesn't touch).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 17:03 [PATCH] nfs: avoid i_lock contention in nfs_clear_invalid_mapping Mike Snitzer
2024-10-18 19:39 ` Jeff Layton
2024-10-18 19:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-10-18 21:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-10-30 19:51 ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2024-10-30 20:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-10-30 20:08 ` Anna Schumaker
2024-10-30 20:11 ` Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bedccb42-4e8a-4b9c-a0d4-982abb7a318e@oracle.com \
--to=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox