From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: trondmy@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Containerised NFS clients and teardown
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:36:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfd19bed9718426f5cfc7033347d3ddeb904080b.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1742502819.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
>
> When a NFS client is started from inside a container, it is often not
> possible to ensure a safe shutdown and flush of the data before the
> container orchestrator steps in to tear down the network. Typically,
> what can happen is that the orchestrator triggers a lazy umount of the
> mounted filesystems, then proceeds to delete virtual network device
> links, bridges, NAT configurations, etc.
>
> Once that happens, it may be impossible to reach into the container to
> perform any further shutdown actions on the NFS client.
>
> This patchset proposes to allow the client to deal with these situations
> by treating the two errors ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH as being fatal.
> The intention is to then allow the I/O queue to drain, and any remaining
> RPC calls to error out, so that the lazy umounts can complete the
> shutdown process.
>
> In order to do so, a new mount option "fatal_errors" is introduced,
> which can take the values "default", "none" and "enetdown:enetunreach".
> The value "none" forces the existing behaviour, whereby hard mounts are
> unaffected by the ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors.
> The value "enetdown:enetunreach" forces ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors
> to always be fatal.
> If the user does not specify the "fatal_errors" option, or uses the
> value "default", then ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH will be fatal if the
> mount was started from inside a network namespace that is not
> "init_net", and otherwise not.
>
> The expectation is that users will normally not need to set this option,
> unless they are running inside a container, and want to prevent ENETDOWN
> and ENETUNREACH from being fatal by setting "-ofatal_errors=none".
>
> ---
> v2:
> - Fix NFSv4 client cl_flag initialisation
> - Add RPC task flag trace decoding
>
> Trond Myklebust (4):
> NFS: Add a mount option to make ENETUNREACH errors fatal
> NFS: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
> pNFS/flexfiles: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
> pNFS/flexfiles: Report ENETDOWN as a connection error
>
> fs/nfs/client.c | 5 ++++
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--
> fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/nfs/nfs3client.c | 2 ++
> fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 7 +++++
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 ++
> fs/nfs/super.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 +
> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h | 5 +++-
> include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 1 +
> include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 1 +
> net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 30 ++++++++++++++------
> 13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
With the bug in patch #3 fixed, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 20:40 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Containerised NFS clients and teardown trondmy
2025-03-20 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] NFS: Add a mount option to make ENETUNREACH errors fatal trondmy
2025-03-20 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] NFS: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers trondmy
2025-03-20 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] pNFS/flexfiles: " trondmy
2025-03-21 14:28 ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] pNFS/flexfiles: Report ENETDOWN as a connection error trondmy
2025-03-21 14:36 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-03-21 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Containerised NFS clients and teardown Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfd19bed9718426f5cfc7033347d3ddeb904080b.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox