Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Shaul Tamari <shaul.tamari@vastdata.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Write delegation stateid permission checks
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:42:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c497a2c1-9bdd-4ccd-91e5-769f4708d9e7@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ee21c03-83a5-4ad8-a54f-5c076125e924@grimberg.me>

On 1/2/25 5:07 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/01/2025 15:41, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 11:08 +0200, Shaul Tamari wrote:
>>> Should the server check permissions for read access as well when
>>> OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE is requested and DELEGATION_WRITE is granted
>>> ?
>>>
>> Possibly? When trying to grant a write delegation, the server should
>> probably also do an opportunistic permission check for read as well,
>> and only grant the delegation if that passes. If it fails, you could
>> still allow the open and just not grant the delegation.
> 
> Yes, that is what Chuck suggested at the time.
> 
>>
>> ISTR that Sagi may have tried this approach though and there was a
>> problem with it?
> 
> Not a problem per se, IIRC the thread left off that we need to sort out
> access reference accounting for nfsd_file for both reads and writes for
> a single write deleg...

I've been pondering this recently.

The desired outcome would be to deal with a OPEN(SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE)
by opening the file twice: once, WR_ONLY, for the OPEN state ID, and
once RW, for the write delegation.

Will that work? won't the two opens conflict with each other and
trigger a delegation recall?

Seems like NFSD will need a lot more logic to make this approach
work right.


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-02 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02  9:08 Write delegation stateid permission checks Shaul Tamari
2025-01-02 13:41 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-02 15:40   ` Rick Macklem
2025-01-02 16:01   ` Chuck Lever
2025-01-02 16:17     ` Rick Macklem
2025-01-02 22:07   ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-02 22:42     ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-01-04 21:47       ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-03 20:58   ` Martin Wege

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c497a2c1-9bdd-4ccd-91e5-769f4708d9e7@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shaul.tamari@vastdata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox