From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:35585 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934283AbdCVNHh (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:07:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] svcrdma: Add svc_rdma_map_reply_hdr() To: Chuck Lever References: <20170316154132.4482.56769.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> <20170316155242.4482.64809.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> Cc: List Linux RDMA Mailing , Linux NFS Mailing List From: Sagi Grimberg Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:07:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I can't think of any. The only time this code changes is > when overhauls like this happens. > > I don't mind putting the out_unmap label back. Your call... >> btw, I'm assuming svc_rdma_unmap_dma() is the opposite of >> svc_rdma_map_reply_hdr() ? > > svc_rdma_map_reply_hdr() DMA-maps the transport header buffer. > > svc_rdma_unmap_dma() DMA-unmaps everything associated with > the ctxt. a bit non trivial, but ok I guess...