From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE only needs to find GC'ed entries
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:29:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cba5f0b6f13a314d78f7c767d47a7b6fac7e5ebc.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22E267B9-BA8C-46BA-A76E-A7A72FA5D9B3@oracle.com>
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 14:18 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi Jeff-
>
>
> > On Jan 5, 2023, at 7:15 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Since v4 files are expected to be long-lived, there's little value in
> > closing them out of the cache when there is conflicting access.
>
> Seems like targeting long-lived nfsd_file items could actually
> be a hazardous behavior. Are you sure it's safe to leave it in
> stable kernels?
>
Basically it just means we end up doing more opens than are needed in
this situation.
The notifiers just unnecessarily unhash a nfsd_file in this case, even
though it doesn't have any chance of freeing it until the client issues
a CLOSE, due to the persistent references held by the stateids.
So, this really is just an optimization and not a "real bug".
>
> > Rename NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE to NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE_GC,
>
> I'd prefer to keep the name as it is. It's for searching for
> inodes, and adding the ".gc = true" to the search criteria is
> enough to show what you are looking for.
>
Ok.
>
> > and change the
> > comparator to also match the gc value in the key. Change both of the
> > current users of that key to set the gc value in the key to "true".
> >
> > Also, test_bit returns bool, AFAICT, so I think we're ok to drop the
> > !! from the condition later in the comparator.
>
> And I'd prefer that you leave this clean up for another patch.
>
Ok, I'll drop that hunk.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > index 9fff1fa09d08..a67b22579c6e 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct rhashtable nfsd_file_rhash_tbl
> > ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> >
> > enum nfsd_file_lookup_type {
> > - NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE,
> > + NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE_GC,
> > NFSD_FILE_KEY_FULL,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -174,7 +174,9 @@ static int nfsd_file_obj_cmpfn(struct rhashtable_compare_arg *arg,
> > const struct nfsd_file *nf = ptr;
> >
> > switch (key->type) {
> > - case NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE:
> > + case NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE_GC:
> > + if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags) != key->gc)
> > + return 1;
> > if (nf->nf_inode != key->inode)
> > return 1;
> > break;
> > @@ -187,7 +189,7 @@ static int nfsd_file_obj_cmpfn(struct rhashtable_compare_arg *arg,
> > return 1;
> > if (!nfsd_match_cred(nf->nf_cred, key->cred))
> > return 1;
> > - if (!!test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags) != key->gc)
> > + if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_GC, &nf->nf_flags) != key->gc)
> > return 1;
> > if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_HASHED, &nf->nf_flags) == 0)
> > return 1;
> > @@ -681,8 +683,9 @@ static void
> > nfsd_file_queue_for_close(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *dispose)
> > {
> > struct nfsd_file_lookup_key key = {
> > - .type = NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE,
> > + .type = NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE_GC,
> > .inode = inode,
> > + .gc = true,
> > };
> > struct nfsd_file *nf;
> >
> > @@ -1057,8 +1060,9 @@ bool
> > nfsd_file_is_cached(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > struct nfsd_file_lookup_key key = {
> > - .type = NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE,
> > + .type = NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE_GC,
> > .inode = inode,
> > + .gc = true,
> > };
> > bool ret = false;
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.0
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-05 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-05 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] nfsd: filecache cleanups and optimizations Jeff Layton
2023-01-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd: don't open-code clear_and_wake_up_bit Jeff Layton
2023-01-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: NFSD_FILE_KEY_INODE only needs to find GC'ed entries Jeff Layton
2023-01-05 14:18 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-01-05 14:29 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-01-05 14:32 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-01-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: don't kill nfsd_files because of lease break error Jeff Layton
2023-01-18 17:54 ` Jeff Layton
2023-01-18 18:45 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-01-05 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: add some comments to nfsd_file_do_acquire Jeff Layton
2023-01-12 3:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] nfsd: filecache cleanups and optimizations Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cba5f0b6f13a314d78f7c767d47a7b6fac7e5ebc.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox