From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: fix potential race in nfsd_file_close
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 05:55:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce698a4d057b596adeac2108d1b543172f3ed936.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166460061835.17572.12490851025838613566@noble.neil.brown.name>
On Sat, 2022-10-01 at 15:03 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Once we call nfsd_file_put, there is no guarantee that "nf" can still be
> > safely accessed. That may have been the last reference.
> >
> > Change the code to instead check for whether nf_ref is 2 and then unhash
> > it and put the reference if we're successful.
> >
> > We might occasionally race with another lookup and end up unhashing it
> > when it probably shouldn't have been, but that should hopefully be rare
> > and will just result in the competing lookup having to create a new
> > nfsd_file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > index 6237715bd23e..58f4d9267f4a 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > @@ -461,12 +461,14 @@ nfsd_file_put(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > */
> > void nfsd_file_close(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> > {
> > - nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > - if (refcount_dec_if_one(&nf->nf_ref)) {
> > - nfsd_file_unhash(nf);
> > - nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf);
> > - nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > + /* One for the reference being put, and one for the hash */
> > + if (refcount_read(&nf->nf_ref) == 2) {
> > + if (nfsd_file_unhash(nf))
> > + nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> > }
> > + /* put the ref for the stateid */
> > + nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > +
>
> This looks racy. What if a get happens after the read and before the unhash?
>
It depends on whether the "getter" sees the HASHED flag or not in
nfsd_file_do_acquire.
If HASHED is still set, then it'll get a reference to the old soon to be
unhashed nfsd_file. If it's no longer HASHED in nfsd_file_do_acquire, it
will fall into the "Did construction of this file fail?" case, and
either retry the lookup or return nfserr_jukebox.
Either is an acceptable outcome since this should presumably be a rare
occurrence.
> If we unhash the nfsd_file at last close, why does the hash table hold a
> counted reference at all?
> When it is hashed, set the NFSD_FILE_HASHED flag. On last-put, if that
> flag is set, unhash it.
> If you want to unhash it earlier, test/clear the flag and delete from
> rhashtable.
>
That's not the way the refcounting works today and I don't see a clear
benefit to making that change. If you want to propose patches to rework
it, I'd be happy to review them though.
>
>
> > }
> >
> > struct nfsd_file *
> > --
> > 2.37.3
> >
> >
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-01 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-30 19:15 [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: filecache fixes Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: nfsd_do_file_acquire should hold rcu_read_lock while getting refs Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:20 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-09-30 19:33 ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:06 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-10-01 4:44 ` NeilBrown
2022-10-01 9:47 ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: fix potential race in nfsd_file_close Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:58 ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:59 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-10-01 5:03 ` NeilBrown
2022-10-01 9:55 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: fix nfsd_file_unhash_and_dispose Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:29 ` Chuck Lever III
2022-09-30 19:42 ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:23 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce698a4d057b596adeac2108d1b543172f3ed936.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).