linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: fix potential race in nfsd_file_close
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 05:55:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce698a4d057b596adeac2108d1b543172f3ed936.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166460061835.17572.12490851025838613566@noble.neil.brown.name>

On Sat, 2022-10-01 at 15:03 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2022, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Once we call nfsd_file_put, there is no guarantee that "nf" can still be
> > safely accessed. That may have been the last reference.
> > 
> > Change the code to instead check for whether nf_ref is 2 and then unhash
> > it and put the reference if we're successful.
> > 
> > We might occasionally race with another lookup and end up unhashing it
> > when it probably shouldn't have been, but that should hopefully be rare
> > and will just result in the competing lookup having to create a new
> > nfsd_file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > index 6237715bd23e..58f4d9267f4a 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > @@ -461,12 +461,14 @@ nfsd_file_put(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> >   */
> >  void nfsd_file_close(struct nfsd_file *nf)
> >  {
> > -	nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > -	if (refcount_dec_if_one(&nf->nf_ref)) {
> > -		nfsd_file_unhash(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_lru_remove(nf);
> > -		nfsd_file_free(nf);
> > +	/* One for the reference being put, and one for the hash */
> > +	if (refcount_read(&nf->nf_ref) == 2) {
> > +		if (nfsd_file_unhash(nf))
> > +			nfsd_file_put_noref(nf);
> >  	}
> > +	/* put the ref for the stateid */
> > +	nfsd_file_put(nf);
> > +
> 
> This looks racy. What if a get happens after the read and before the unhash?
> 

It depends on whether the "getter" sees the HASHED flag or not in
nfsd_file_do_acquire.

If HASHED is still set, then it'll get a reference to the old soon to be
unhashed nfsd_file. If it's no longer HASHED in nfsd_file_do_acquire, it
will fall into the "Did construction of this file fail?" case, and
either retry the lookup or return nfserr_jukebox.

Either is an acceptable outcome since this should presumably be a rare
occurrence.

> If we unhash the nfsd_file at last close, why does the hash table hold a
> counted reference at all?
> When it is hashed, set the NFSD_FILE_HASHED flag.  On last-put, if that
> flag is set, unhash it.
> If you want to unhash it earlier, test/clear the flag and delete from
> rhashtable.
> 

That's not the way the refcounting works today and I don't see a clear
benefit to making that change. If you want to propose patches to rework
it, I'd be happy to review them though.

> 
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  struct nfsd_file *
> > -- 
> > 2.37.3
> > 
> > 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-01  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-30 19:15 [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: filecache fixes Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: nfsd_do_file_acquire should hold rcu_read_lock while getting refs Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:20   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-09-30 19:33     ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:06       ` Chuck Lever III
2022-10-01  4:44   ` NeilBrown
2022-10-01  9:47     ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: fix potential race in nfsd_file_close Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:58   ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:59     ` Chuck Lever III
2022-10-01  5:03   ` NeilBrown
2022-10-01  9:55     ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2022-09-30 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: fix nfsd_file_unhash_and_dispose Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 19:29   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-09-30 19:42     ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-30 20:23       ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ce698a4d057b596adeac2108d1b543172f3ed936.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).