[PATCH 0/2] nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

[PATCH 0/2] nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

[Josef Bacik]

Hello,

Here are two patches to address a UAF we've been seeing in our stress testing
with NFS internally.  The first one is to clean up the accesses to the
nfs_direct_req fields which is more a matter of correctness than an actual
observed problem.  The second patch is to address the problem itself.  I've been
running these patches on my stress test for a few hours now, I would appreciate
feedback and review to see if this is the correct way to fix the problem.
Thanks,

Josef

Josef Bacik (2):
  nfs: properly protect nfs_direct_req fields
  nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

 fs/nfs/direct.c        | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 fs/nfs/write.c         |  2 +-
 include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 1/2] nfs: properly protect nfs_direct_req fields

[Josef Bacik]

We protect accesses to the nfs_direct_req fields with the dreq->lock
ever where except nfs_direct_commit_complete.  This isn't a huge deal,
but it does lead to confusion, and we could potentially end up setting
NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES in one thread where we've had an error in
another.  Clean this up to properly protect ->error and ->flags in the
commit completion path.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index c03926a1cc73..befcc167e25f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
 
 	trace_nfs_direct_commit_complete(dreq);
 
+	spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
 	if (status < 0) {
 		/* Errors in commit are fatal */
 		dreq->error = status;
@@ -613,6 +614,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
 	} else {
 		status = dreq->error;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
 
 	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
 
@@ -625,7 +627,10 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
 			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
 			nfs_release_request(req);
 		} else if (!nfs_write_match_verf(verf, req)) {
-			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
+			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
+			if (dreq->flags == 0)
+				dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
+			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
 			/*
 			 * Despite the reboot, the write was successful,
 			 * so reset wb_nio.
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfs: properly protect nfs_direct_req fields

[Jeff Layton]

On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 11:49 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We protect accesses to the nfs_direct_req fields with the dreq->lock
> ever where except nfs_direct_commit_complete.  This isn't a huge deal,
> but it does lead to confusion, and we could potentially end up setting
> NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES in one thread where we've had an error in
> another.  Clean this up to properly protect ->error and ->flags in the
> commit completion path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/direct.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> index c03926a1cc73..befcc167e25f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
>  
>  	trace_nfs_direct_commit_complete(dreq);
>  
> +	spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
>  	if (status < 0) {
>  		/* Errors in commit are fatal */
>  		dreq->error = status;
> @@ -613,6 +614,7 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
>  	} else {
>  		status = dreq->error;
>  	}
> +	spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
>  
>  	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
>  
> @@ -625,7 +627,10 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
>  			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
>  			nfs_release_request(req);
>  		} else if (!nfs_write_match_verf(verf, req)) {
> -			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
> +			spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
> +			if (dreq->flags == 0)
> +				dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
> +			spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
>  			/*
>  			 * Despite the reboot, the write was successful,
>  			 * so reset wb_nio.

Seems reasonable, even if just for consistency's sake:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

[PATCH 2/2] nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

[Josef Bacik]

In production we have been hitting the following warning consistently

------------[ cut here ]------------
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
Workqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs]
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? __warn+0x9f/0x130
 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
 ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150
 ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
 nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs]
 process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0
 worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0
 ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220
 kthread+0xdc/0x120
 ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is because we're completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a row.

The source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we
process them and send them off, and then in the completion path for the
commit requests we have

if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
	nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);

However since we're submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes have
one that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up calling
complete on the nfs_direct_request twice.

The only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in
__nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a

nfs_commit_begin();
nfs_commit_end();

Which is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one
that is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq()
calls around where we process events as well as in the completion paths.

Fix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.

Before with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop
every 10ish minutes.  With my patch the stress test has been running for
several hours without popping.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c        | 11 +++++++++--
 fs/nfs/write.c         |  2 +-
 include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index befcc167e25f..6b8798d01e3a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -672,10 +672,17 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_schedule(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
 	LIST_HEAD(mds_list);
 
 	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
+	nfs_commit_begin(cinfo.mds);
 	nfs_scan_commit(dreq->inode, &mds_list, &cinfo);
 	res = nfs_generic_commit_list(dreq->inode, &mds_list, 0, &cinfo);
-	if (res < 0) /* res == -ENOMEM */
-		nfs_direct_write_reschedule(dreq);
+	if (res < 0) { /* res == -ENOMEM */
+		spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
+		if (dreq->flags == 0)
+			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
+		spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
+	}
+	if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
+		nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
 }
 
 static void nfs_direct_write_clear_reqs(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index bb79d3a886ae..5d9dc6c05325 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static int wait_on_commit(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
 				       !atomic_read(&cinfo->rpcs_out));
 }
 
-static void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
+void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
 {
 	atomic_inc(&cinfo->rpcs_out);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
index f5ce7b101146..d59116ac8209 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ int nfs_wb_folio_cancel(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio);
 extern int  nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *, int);
 extern struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void);
 extern void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_commit_data *data);
+void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
 bool nfs_commit_end(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
 
 static inline bool nfs_have_writebacks(const struct inode *inode)
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

[Jeff Layton]

On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 11:49 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> In production we have been hitting the following warning consistently
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
> Workqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs]
> RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  ? __warn+0x9f/0x130
>  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
>  ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150
>  ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70
>  ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40
>  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
>  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
>  nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs]
>  process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0
>  worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0
>  ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220
>  kthread+0xdc/0x120
>  ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> 
> This is because we're completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a row.
> 
> The source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we
> process them and send them off, and then in the completion path for the
> commit requests we have
> 
> if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
> 	nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
> 
> However since we're submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes have
> one that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up calling
> complete on the nfs_direct_request twice.
> 
> The only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in
> __nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a
> 
> nfs_commit_begin();
> nfs_commit_end();
> 
> Which is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one
> that is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq()
> calls around where we process events as well as in the completion paths.
> 
> Fix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.
> 
> Before with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop
> every 10ish minutes.  With my patch the stress test has been running for
> several hours without popping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/direct.c        | 11 +++++++++--
>  fs/nfs/write.c         |  2 +-
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> index befcc167e25f..6b8798d01e3a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> @@ -672,10 +672,17 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_schedule(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
>  	LIST_HEAD(mds_list);
>  
>  	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
> +	nfs_commit_begin(cinfo.mds);
>  	nfs_scan_commit(dreq->inode, &mds_list, &cinfo);
>  	res = nfs_generic_commit_list(dreq->inode, &mds_list, 0, &cinfo);
> -	if (res < 0) /* res == -ENOMEM */
> -		nfs_direct_write_reschedule(dreq);
> +	if (res < 0) { /* res == -ENOMEM */
> +		spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
> +		if (dreq->flags == 0)
> +			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
> +		spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
> +	}
> +	if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
> +		nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);


Before, it was calling nfs_direct_write_reschedule directly, but with
the above change it's now just setting NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES and
then queueing the completion workqueue job if it's the last reference
(which should then go and reschedule the job, I think).

That may be a reasonable change to make, but I think it merits some
justification and mention in the changelog. Was that change necessary
for some reason? If so, why?


>  }
>  
>  static void nfs_direct_write_clear_reqs(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index bb79d3a886ae..5d9dc6c05325 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static int wait_on_commit(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
>  				       !atomic_read(&cinfo->rpcs_out));
>  }
>  
> -static void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
> +void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
>  {
>  	atomic_inc(&cinfo->rpcs_out);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index f5ce7b101146..d59116ac8209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ int nfs_wb_folio_cancel(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio);
>  extern int  nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *, int);
>  extern struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void);
>  extern void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_commit_data *data);
> +void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
>  bool nfs_commit_end(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
>  
>  static inline bool nfs_have_writebacks(const struct inode *inode)

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfs: fix UAF in direct writes

[Trond Myklebust]

On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 11:49 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> In production we have been hitting the following warning consistently
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28
> refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
> Workqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs]
> RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  ? __warn+0x9f/0x130
>  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
>  ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150
>  ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70
>  ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40
>  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
>  ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0
>  nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs]
>  process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0
>  worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0
>  ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220
>  kthread+0xdc/0x120
>  ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> 
> This is because we're completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a
> row.
> 
> The source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we
> process them and send them off, and then in the completion path for
> the
> commit requests we have
> 
> if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
> 	nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
> 
> However since we're submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes
> have
> one that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up
> calling
> complete on the nfs_direct_request twice.
> 
> The only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in
> __nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a
> 
> nfs_commit_begin();
> nfs_commit_end();
> 
> Which is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one
> that is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq()
> calls around where we process events as well as in the completion
> paths.
> 
> Fix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.
> 
> Before with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop
> every 10ish minutes.  With my patch the stress test has been running
> for
> several hours without popping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

I think this deserves to be a stable patch. Thanks for finding it!

> ---
>  fs/nfs/direct.c        | 11 +++++++++--
>  fs/nfs/write.c         |  2 +-
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> index befcc167e25f..6b8798d01e3a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> @@ -672,10 +672,17 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_schedule(struct
> nfs_direct_req *dreq)
>  	LIST_HEAD(mds_list);
>  
>  	nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq);
> +	nfs_commit_begin(cinfo.mds);
>  	nfs_scan_commit(dreq->inode, &mds_list, &cinfo);
>  	res = nfs_generic_commit_list(dreq->inode, &mds_list, 0,
> &cinfo);
> -	if (res < 0) /* res == -ENOMEM */
> -		nfs_direct_write_reschedule(dreq);
> +	if (res < 0) { /* res == -ENOMEM */
> +		spin_lock(&dreq->lock);
> +		if (dreq->flags == 0)
> +			dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES;
> +		spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
> +	}
> +	if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))
> +		nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
>  }
>  
>  static void nfs_direct_write_clear_reqs(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq)
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index bb79d3a886ae..5d9dc6c05325 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static int wait_on_commit(struct
> nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
>  				       !atomic_read(&cinfo-
> >rpcs_out));
>  }
>  
> -static void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
> +void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo)
>  {
>  	atomic_inc(&cinfo->rpcs_out);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index f5ce7b101146..d59116ac8209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ int nfs_wb_folio_cancel(struct inode *inode,
> struct folio *folio);
>  extern int  nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *, int);
>  extern struct nfs_commit_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void);
>  extern void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_commit_data *data);
> +void nfs_commit_begin(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
>  bool nfs_commit_end(struct nfs_mds_commit_info *cinfo);
>  
>  static inline bool nfs_have_writebacks(const struct inode *inode)

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com