From: Benjamin Coddington <ben.coddington@hammerspace.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Daire Byrne <daire@brahma.io>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/4] nfsd: per-client fair-queue dispatch
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:09:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1780498019.git.bcodding@hammerspace.com> (raw)
knfsd dispatches ready transports from a single per-pool FIFO, so a
client's share of nfsd service scales with the number of connections it
holds rather than being shared per client. A client that opens many
connections (nconnect, or a farm of data movers) starves other clients
on the same server purely by out-numbering them in sockets.
I measured this with a load generator that pins each request to a fixed
service time and does no filesystem work, so that nfsd thread-time is the
only scarce resource (8 threads, 10ms/op, ~648 ops/s pool ceiling). A
greedy client opens K connections alongside one single-connection
interactive client.
NFSv3, dispatch as it is today:
greedy K greedy share interactive ops/s
1 50% 241
4 80% 129
8 89% 72
16 94% 38
The interactive client's share tracks 1/(K+1) and its throughput falls
roughly 6x while it does nothing different. NFSv4.1 behaves identically
(89% greedy at K=8) even when the greedy connections are bound to a
single session, because the dispatch decision is below the NFS version.
The same NFSv4.1 workload with fair queueing enabled:
greedy K greedy share interactive ops/s
8 72% 182
16 73% 177
32 70% 193
The greedy client's share no longer climbs with its connection count and
the interactive client recovers (72 -> 182 ops/s at K=8). Aggregate
throughput is unchanged: the T/D pool ceiling is the same with fair
queueing on and off. The split does not reach 50/50 because a single
interactive connection is bounded by its request window and by XPT_BUSY
serialising one transport; with a deeper window it reaches ~59/41.
The approach:
- sunrpc grows an opaque per-transport fairness key (patch 1), with a
default derived from the source address (the source port is excluded
so a client's several connections share one key), and an opt-in
per-pool scheduler that buckets ready transports by that key and
dispatches round-robin across keys (patch 2). When it is disabled,
which is the default, the existing lockless FIFO path is unchanged.
- nfsd gains a "fairq" module parameter to turn it on (patch 3) and
stamps the NFSv4.1 clientid as the key when a connection binds to a
session (patch 4), so all of a client's connections share one key.
NFSv3 uses the source-address default.
This is an RFC; a few questions for the list:
- Unit of fairness: clientid (used here) or session? Earlier
discussion leaned toward exploring per-session.
- Mechanism: a fixed bucket hash under a per-pool spinlock taken only
on the opt-in path, versus a lockless or per-flow structure.
- Would a per-client in-flight cap be preferable to proportional fair
queueing?
The measurement used a debug-only filehandle-latency hook that is not
part of this series.
Benjamin Coddington (4):
sunrpc: add a per-transport fairness key to svc_xprt
sunrpc: dispatch ready transports fairly per client
nfsd: add a fairq module parameter
nfsd: key NFSv4.1 connections by clientid for fair queueing
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 +++
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 19 +++
include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 5 +
include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h | 46 ++++++-
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 2 +
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
base-commit: e7ca66ba17f1b5e4ecbb29b9c3c4a31aa062bed0
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 15:09 Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2026-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] sunrpc: add a per-transport fairness key to svc_xprt Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] sunrpc: dispatch ready transports fairly per client Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] nfsd: add a fairq module parameter Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-03 15:09 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] nfsd: key NFSv4.1 connections by clientid for fair queueing Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-03 22:52 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] nfsd: per-client fair-queue dispatch NeilBrown
2026-06-04 12:11 ` Daire Byrne
2026-06-04 14:54 ` Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 16:08 ` Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-04 16:43 ` Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 21:11 ` NeilBrown
2026-06-04 14:25 ` Benjamin Coddington
2026-06-04 22:27 ` Jeff Layton
2026-06-04 22:48 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1780498019.git.bcodding@hammerspace.com \
--to=ben.coddington@hammerspace.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=daire@brahma.io \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox