Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
	Chuck Lever	 <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia	 <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	 Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner	 <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] NFSD: Enforce Timeout on Layout Recall and Integrate Lease Manager Fencing
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:14:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4bcac6c312a5ea1691536e9b029fb00d8c77cac.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88a3edc5-4928-4235-a555-a7017d5ca502@app.fastmail.com>

On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 12:11 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> > +
> > +	if (work_busy(&ls->ls_fence_work.work))
> > +		return false;
> > +	/* Schedule work to do the fence operation */
> > +	ret = mod_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &ls->ls_fence_work, 0);
> > +	if (!ret) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If there is no pending work, mod_delayed_work queues
> > +		 * new task. While fencing is in progress, a reference
> > +		 * count is added to the layout stateid to ensure its
> > +		 * validity. This reference count is released once fencing
> > +		 * has been completed.
> > +		 */
> > +		refcount_inc(&ls->ls_stid.sc_count);
> > +		++ls->ls_fence_retry_cnt;
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> 
> Incrementing after the mod_delayed_work() call is racy. Instead:
> 
> refcount_inc(&ls->ls_stid.sc_count);
> ret = mod_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &ls->ls_fence_work, 0);
> if (ret) {
>     refcount_dec(&ls->ls_stid.sc_count);
>     ....
> }
> 

Is that safe? That's done in nfsd_break_one_deleg() for similar
reasons, but there is a comment over that function explaining why it's
OK.

We'll need to validate that the lease is always released before the
sc_count goes to 0 here too. At first glance, it doesn't look like that
is the case.


-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-27  0:50 [PATCH v4 1/1] NFSD: Enforce Timeout on Layout Recall and Integrate Lease Manager Fencing Dai Ngo
2026-01-27 17:11 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-27 18:14   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-01-27 20:38     ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-27 20:36   ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-27 21:53     ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-28  0:50       ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-27 17:54 ` Jeff Layton
2026-01-27 20:52   ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-28 17:25   ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-28 18:01     ` Jeff Layton
2026-01-28 18:27       ` Dai Ngo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4bcac6c312a5ea1691536e9b029fb00d8c77cac.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox