From: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
okorniev@redhat.com, tom@talpey.com, hch@infradead.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Fix SCSI reservation conflict causing pNFS client to revert I/O to MDS
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:41:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddcea773-3d9a-47d0-b857-087655b2ec13@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475D1227-CB10-461D-9EC1-A303B74A701E@redhat.com>
Hi Ben,
On 9/30/25 12:15 PM, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> Hi Dai,
>
> On 30 Sep 2025, at 12:28, Dai Ngo wrote:
>
>> When servicing the GETDEVICEINFO call from an NFS client, the NFS server
>> creates a SCSI persistent reservation on the target device using the
>> reservation type PR_EXCLUSIVE_ACCESS_REG_ONLY. This setting restricts
>> device access so that only hosts registered with a reservation key can
>> perform read or write operations. Any unregistered initiator is completely
>> blocked, including standard SCSI commands such as READCAPACITY.
> SBC-4, table 13 shows that READ CAPACITY should be allowed from any I_T
> nexus, no matter the state of the reservation on the LU.
>
> Is it possible that your SCSI implementation might be out of the spec? Also
> possible that SBC-4 has been updated, I haven't been following the SCSI
> specification updates..
>
> Ben
I don't have access to SBC-4 spec, t10.org does not allow guest access
to their docs. Can you please share the content of table 13 here?
I found the "SCSI Commands Reference Manual" from Seagate. Below is
a description of the reservation type, apologize for the format due to
copy & paste from the doc. Based on this table, code 6h (Exclusive
Access - Registrant only) seems to state media-access commands (I assume
READ_CAPACITY is included) are only allowed for registered I_T nexuses.
I'll continue to research for the official definition of the Reservation
type.
Thanks,
-Dai
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 82 Persistent reservation type codes
Code Name Description
0h Obsolete
1h
Write
Exclusive
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access write commands)
are only
allowed for the persistent reservation holder (see SPC-5).
Persistent Reservation Holder: There is only one persistent reservation
holder.
2h Obsolete
3h
Exclusive
Access
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access commands) are
only allowed for
the persistent reservation holder (see SPC-5).
Persistent Reservation Holder: There is only one persistent reservation
holder.
4h Obsolete
5h
Write Exclusive –
Registrants
Only
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access write commands)
are only
allowed for registered I_T nexuses.
Persistent Reservation Holder: There is only one persistent reservation
holder (see SPC-5).
6h
Exclusive Access –
Registrants
Only
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access commands) are
only allowed for
registered I_T nexuses.
Persistent Reservation Holder: There is only one persistent reservation
holder (see SPC-5).
7h
Write Exclusive –
All
Registrants
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access write commands)
are only
allowed for registered I_T nexuses.
Persistent Reservation Holder: Each registered I_T nexus is a persistent
reservation holder
(see SPC-5).
8h
Exclusive Access –
All
Registrants
Access Restrictions: Some commands (e.g., media-access commands) are
only allowed for
registered I_T nexuses.
Persistent Reservation Holder: Each registered I_T nexus is a persistent
reservation holder
(see SPC-5).
9h - Fh Reserved
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 16:28 [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Fix SCSI reservation conflict causing pNFS client to revert I/O to MDS Dai Ngo
2025-09-30 19:15 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-09-30 21:41 ` Dai Ngo [this message]
2025-10-01 10:54 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-10-01 17:36 ` Dai Ngo
2025-10-03 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-07 16:49 ` Dai Ngo
2025-10-07 15:59 ` Dai Ngo
2025-10-07 20:37 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-10-09 17:43 ` Dai Ngo
2025-10-09 19:46 ` Benjamin Coddington
2025-10-09 20:20 ` Dai Ngo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddcea773-3d9a-47d0-b857-087655b2ec13@oracle.com \
--to=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).