Re: [PATCH] Fix build with glibc-2.42

[Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>]

On 6/27/25 6:06 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@redhat.com>
> 
> exportfs.c: In function ‘release_lockfile’:
> exportfs.c:83:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
>     83 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_ULOCK, 0);
>        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> exportfs.c: In function ‘grab_lockfile’:
> exportfs.c:77:17: error: ignoring return value of ‘lockf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result]
>     77 |                 lockf(_lockfd, F_LOCK, 0);
>        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> lockf is now marked with attribute warn_unused_result:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f3c82fc1b41261f582f5f9fa12f74af9bcbc88f9
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Committed... (tag: nfs-utils-2-8-4-rc3)

steved.
> ---
>   utils/exportfs/exportfs.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/exportfs/exportfs.c b/utils/exportfs/exportfs.c
> index b03a047b..748c38e3 100644
> --- a/utils/exportfs/exportfs.c
> +++ b/utils/exportfs/exportfs.c
> @@ -74,13 +74,19 @@ grab_lockfile(void)
>   {
>   	_lockfd = open(lockfile, O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0666);
>   	if (_lockfd != -1)
> -		lockf(_lockfd, F_LOCK, 0);
> +		if (lockf(_lockfd, F_LOCK, 0) != 0) {
> +			xlog_warn("%s: lockf() failed: errno %d (%s)",
> +			__func__, errno, strerror(errno));
> +		}
>   }
>   static void
>   release_lockfile(void)
>   {
>   	if (_lockfd != -1) {
> -		lockf(_lockfd, F_ULOCK, 0);
> +		if (lockf(_lockfd, F_ULOCK, 0) != 0) {
> +			xlog_warn("%s: lockf() failed: errno %d (%s)",
> +			__func__, errno, strerror(errno));
> +		}
>   		close(_lockfd);
>   		_lockfd = -1;
>   	}