From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865FAC2BA15 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624E320659 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726830AbgDER5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:57:36 -0400 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.36]:40115 "EHLO out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726776AbgDER5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:57:36 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R291e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07488;MF=wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Tuft5DG_1586109442; Received: from Macintosh.local(mailfrom:wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Tuft5DG_1586109442) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 01:57:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3] SUNRPC/cache: Fix unsafe traverse caused double-free in cache_purge From: Yihao Wu To: "J . Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , NeilBrown , Sasha Levin Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org References: <4568a7cf87f110b8e59fda6f53fda34c550ab403.1586108200.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 01:57:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4568a7cf87f110b8e59fda6f53fda34c550ab403.1586108200.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Deleting list entry within hlist_for_each_entry_safe is not safe unless next pointer (tmp) is protected too. It's not, because once hash_lock is released, cache_clean may delete the entry that tmp points to. Then cache_purge can walk to a deleted entry and tries to double free it. Fix this bug by holding only the deleted entry's reference. Signed-off-by: Yihao Wu --- v1->v2: Use Neil's better solution v2->v3: Fix a checkscript warning net/sunrpc/cache.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index af0ddd28b081..b445874e8e2f 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c @@ -541,7 +541,9 @@ void cache_purge(struct cache_detail *detail) dprintk("RPC: %d entries in %s cache\n", detail->entries, detail->name); for (i = 0; i < detail->hash_size; i++) { head = &detail->hash_table[i]; - hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ch, tmp, head, cache_list) { + while (!hlist_empty(head)) { + ch = hlist_entry(head->first, struct cache_head, + cache_list); sunrpc_begin_cache_remove_entry(ch, detail); spin_unlock(&detail->hash_lock); sunrpc_end_cache_remove_entry(ch, detail); -- 2.20.1.2432.ga663e714