From: Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS troubles
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:05:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1d10240-31a6-af26-d71c-df96d0c19829@nwra.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A560163-BA54-4051-9BB4-12087952987D@oracle.com>
On 04/06/2018 10:24 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 12:07 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/2018 09:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Kernel is 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64 I don't have Red Hat support for these
>>> systems.
>>>
>>> I discovered that I'd been forcing vers=4.0 mounts in order to work around a
>>> mounting issue.
>>
>> And I'm back to seeing the mount issue at boot. Here's the situation - we're
>> forcing kerberos on the public network, but allowing sec=sys on some private
>> networks:
>>
>> /etc/exports:
>> / -ro,async,fsid=0 192.168.1.0/24(sec=sys)
>> 192.168.2.0/24(sec=sys) *.nwra.com(sec=krb5)
>> /export/home -rw,async,nohide 192.168.1.0/24(sec=sys)
>> 192.168.2.0/24(sec=sys) *.nwra.com(sec=krb5)
>>
>> So for a while after boot, attempts to mount with sec=sys fail:
>>
>> # mount -t nfs4 -s -o
>> sec=sys,intr,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,noatime,lookupcache=positive,actimeo=1
>> earthib.cora.nwra.com:/export/home/greg /mnt
>> mount.nfs4: Operation not permitted
>>
>> But then later they work:
>>
>> # mount -t nfs4 -s -o
>> sec=sys,intr,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,noatime,lookupcache=positive,actimeo=1
>> earthib.cora.nwra.com:/export/home/greg /mnt
>> # umount /mnt
>>
>> This can cycle back and forth.
>>
>> I've attached a packet capture of some failed mount attempts. It seems that
>> even with specifying sec=sys, some kerberos stuff is going on.
>>
>> It appears to be related to mounting a different sec=krb5 mount over the
>> public network from the same server. While that mount is active, the sec=sys
>> mounts fail. When it is unmounted, they work. At least now I think I can
>> work around this...
>
> For NFSv4, the client is going to use krb5i to do lease management even
> on sec=sys mounts. An NFSv4 server has to know for sure when it is talking
> to the same client on different network interfaces or with different
> security flavors. Thus the client has to use the same security flavor for
> lease management on all of its mounts of that server. That's not controlled
> by the sec= mount option.
>
> I assume that "but then later" lasts only a few multiples of the server's
> lease time (90 seconds by default)?
>
> Clients that use only the private network interface should be able to use
> sec=sys. But clients that use both the public and private interfaces should
> need to use sec=krb5 on both.
Testing again with RHEL 7.5 beta:
3.10.0-830.el7.x86_64
nfs-utils-1.3.0-0.52.el7.x86_64
Near as I can tell, with NFS version 4.1 mounts, as long as there is an active
sec=krb5 mount to a server, sec=sys mounts to that server fail (with the above
/etc/exports). As soon as I unmount the sec=krb5 mount, the sec=sys mount
works. And vice-versa - an active sec=sys mount prevents sec=krb5 mounts.
Waiting does not appear to help. The sporadic behavior noted before was due
to the use of the automounter - as mounts came and went different ones would
break.
If I use NFS version 4.0, I can have both. But then I get the locking bug in
my original post.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-06 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 17:50 NFS troubles Orion Poplawski
2018-04-02 18:30 ` Benjamin Coddington
2018-04-03 15:44 ` Orion Poplawski
2018-04-04 14:08 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-04-06 16:07 ` Orion Poplawski
2018-04-06 16:24 ` Chuck Lever
2018-04-06 18:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-04-06 18:18 ` Chuck Lever
2018-04-06 22:05 ` Orion Poplawski [this message]
2018-04-07 0:15 ` Chuck Lever
2018-04-07 2:46 ` Bruce Fields
2018-04-07 21:23 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1d10240-31a6-af26-d71c-df96d0c19829@nwra.com \
--to=orion@nwra.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).