Re: [PATCH 4/5] nfsd: clean up if statement in nfsd4_close_open_stateid()

[Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:26 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Just set unhashed to false in the one case where we return that
> explicitly, and drop the else.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index a7bac93445e2fdbe743b77e66238d652094907cb..1f3e9d42fcd784ea8d101ad3549702a30dfe9058 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -7644,12 +7644,11 @@ static bool nfsd4_close_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *s)
>  		list_for_each_entry(stp, &reaplist, st_locks)
>  			nfs4_free_cpntf_statelist(clp->net, &stp->st_stid);
>  		free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
> -		spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> -		free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
> -		return unhashed;
> +		unhashed = false;
>  	}
> +	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> +	free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
> +	return unhashed;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

My apologies, Chuck. This patch has a bug in it. Can you drop it from
nfsd-testing? I may or may not send a replacement.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>