From: Wenle Chen <solomonchenclever@gmail.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: "chenwenle@huawei.com" <chenwenle@huawei.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nixiaoming@huawei.com" <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Limit the number of retries
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:33:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebee08ee-ecbe-c47c-1f7c-799f86b3879c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db50c039cb8b8325bb428c60ff005b899654fb4.camel@hammerspace.com>
Trond Myklebust 於 2020/11/3 上午1:45 寫道:
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 00:24 +0800, Wenle Chen wrote:
>> We can't wait forever, even if the state
>> is always delayed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenle Chen <chenwenle@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index f6b5dc792b33..bb2316bf13f6 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -7390,15 +7390,17 @@ int nfs4_lock_delegation_recall(struct
>> file_lock *fl, struct nfs4_state *state,
>> {
>> struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
>> int err;
>> + int retry = 3;
>>
>> err = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, fl);
>> if (err != 0)
>> return err;
>> do {
>> err = _nfs4_do_setlk(state, F_SETLK, fl,
>> NFS_LOCK_NEW);
>> - if (err != -NFS4ERR_DELAY)
>> + if (err != -NFS4ERR_DELAY || retry == 0)
>> break;
>> ssleep(1);
>> + --retry;
>> } while (1);
>> return nfs4_handle_delegation_recall_error(server, state,
>> stateid, fl, err);
>> }
>
> This patch will just cause the locks to be silently lost, no?
>
This loop was introduced in commit 3d7a9520f0c3e to simplify the delay
retry loop. Before this, the function nfs4_lock_delegation_recall would
return a -EAGAIN to do a whole retry loop.
When we retried three times and waited three seconds, it was still in
delay. I think we can get a whole loop and check the other points if it
was changed or not. It is just a proposal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 16:24 [PATCH 0/2] NFS: Delay Retry Proposed Changes Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Reduce redundant comparison Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Limit the number of retries Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 17:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-04 11:33 ` Wenle Chen [this message]
2020-11-04 13:22 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-11-04 15:51 ` Wenle Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebee08ee-ecbe-c47c-1f7c-799f86b3879c@gmail.com \
--to=solomonchenclever@gmail.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=chenwenle@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox