public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenle Chen <solomonchenclever@gmail.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: "chenwenle@huawei.com" <chenwenle@huawei.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nixiaoming@huawei.com" <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Limit the number of retries
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:33:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebee08ee-ecbe-c47c-1f7c-799f86b3879c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db50c039cb8b8325bb428c60ff005b899654fb4.camel@hammerspace.com>



Trond Myklebust 於 2020/11/3 上午1:45 寫道:
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 00:24 +0800, Wenle Chen wrote:
>>    We can't wait forever, even if the state
>> is always delayed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenle Chen <chenwenle@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index f6b5dc792b33..bb2316bf13f6 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -7390,15 +7390,17 @@ int nfs4_lock_delegation_recall(struct
>> file_lock *fl, struct nfs4_state *state,
>>   {
>>          struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
>>          int err;
>> +       int retry = 3;
>>   
>>          err = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, fl);
>>          if (err != 0)
>>                  return err;
>>          do {
>>                  err = _nfs4_do_setlk(state, F_SETLK, fl,
>> NFS_LOCK_NEW);
>> -               if (err != -NFS4ERR_DELAY)
>> +               if (err != -NFS4ERR_DELAY || retry == 0)
>>                          break;
>>                  ssleep(1);
>> +               --retry;
>>          } while (1);
>>          return nfs4_handle_delegation_recall_error(server, state,
>> stateid, fl, err);
>>   }
> 
> This patch will just cause the locks to be silently lost, no?
> 
This loop was introduced in commit 3d7a9520f0c3e to simplify the delay 
retry loop. Before this, the function nfs4_lock_delegation_recall would 
return a -EAGAIN to do a whole retry loop.

When we retried three times and waited three seconds, it was still in 
delay. I think we can get a whole loop and check the other points if it 
was changed or not. It is just a proposal.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-02 16:24 [PATCH 0/2] NFS: Delay Retry Proposed Changes Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Reduce redundant comparison Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Limit the number of retries Wenle Chen
2020-11-02 17:45   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-04 11:33     ` Wenle Chen [this message]
2020-11-04 13:22       ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-11-04 15:51         ` Wenle Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebee08ee-ecbe-c47c-1f7c-799f86b3879c@gmail.com \
    --to=solomonchenclever@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=chenwenle@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox