From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@yandex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSD: Disallow layoutget during grace period
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:33:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2f09b651a30333e0c9fce311c848c8803c2f7ca.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825131122.98410-1-sergeybashirov@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2025-08-25 at 16:11 +0300, Sergey Bashirov wrote:
> When the server is recovering from a reboot and is in a grace period,
> any operation that may result in deletion or reallocation of block
> extents should not be allowed. See RFC 8881, section 18.43.3.
>
> If multiple clients write data to the same file, rebooting the server
> during writing may result in file corruption. In the worst case, the
> exported XFS may also become corrupted. Observed this behavior while
> testing pNFS block volume setup.
>
> Co-developed-by: Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@yandex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@yandex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index bfebe6e25638a..3000b43be9221 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -2435,6 +2435,7 @@ static __be32
> nfsd4_layoutget(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, union nfsd4_op_u *u)
> {
> + struct net *net = SVC_NET(rqstp);
> struct nfsd4_layoutget *lgp = &u->layoutget;
> struct svc_fh *current_fh = &cstate->current_fh;
> const struct nfsd4_layout_ops *ops;
> @@ -2486,6 +2487,10 @@ nfsd4_layoutget(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> if (lgp->lg_seg.length == 0)
> goto out;
>
> + nfserr = nfserr_grace;
> + if (locks_in_grace(net))
> + goto out;
> +
> nfserr = nfsd4_preprocess_layout_stateid(rqstp, cstate, &lgp->lg_sid,
> true, lgp->lg_layout_type, &ls);
> if (nfserr) {
This seems like a reasonable thing to do, but I wonder if it makes
sense across all different pNFS layout types? This restriction is
definitely not needed for the (trivial) in-kernel flexfiles server, for
instance.
Maybe it'd be best to push this down into the individual layout drivers
and let them make the decision?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 13:11 [PATCH] NFSD: Disallow layoutget during grace period Sergey Bashirov
2025-08-25 16:33 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-08-27 18:07 ` Sergey Bashirov
2025-09-05 14:27 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2f09b651a30333e0c9fce311c848c8803c2f7ca.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=koevtushenko@yandex.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox