From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] NFSD: Document lack of f_pos_lock in nfsd_readdir()
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:42:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb7ad4e6dd8a8ed9e7ecf83f23030c035a1dd4d9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170044303100.5164.767231155248883501.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net>
On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 20:17 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> Al Viro notes that normal system calls hold f_pos_lock when calling
> ->iterate_shared and ->llseek; however nfsd_readdir() does not take
> that mutex when calling these methods.
>
> It should be safe however because the struct file acquired by
> nfsd_readdir() is not visible to other threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index fbbea7498f02..87a5953c6bf0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -2109,9 +2109,23 @@ static __be32 nfsd_buffered_readdir(struct file *file, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> return cdp->err;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Read entries from a directory.
> - * The NFSv3/4 verifier we ignore for now.
> +/**
> + * nfsd_readdir - Read entries from a directory
> + * @rqstp: RPC transaction context
> + * @fhp: NFS file handle of directory to be read
> + * @offsetp: OUT: seek offset of final entry that was read
> + * @cdp: OUT: an eof error value
> + * @func: entry filler actor
> + *
> + * This implementation ignores the NFSv3/4 verifier cookie.
> + *
> + * NB: normal system calls hold file->f_pos_lock when calling
> + * ->iterate_shared and ->llseek, but nfsd_readdir() does not.
> + * Because the struct file acquired here is not visible to other
> + * threads, it's internal state does not need mutex protection.
> + *
> + * Returns nfs_ok on success, otherwise an nfsstat code is
> + * returned.
> */
> __be32
> nfsd_readdir(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, loff_t *offsetp,
>
>
Good thing to document
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-27 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 1:17 [PATCH v1] NFSD: Document lack of f_pos_lock in nfsd_readdir() Chuck Lever
2023-11-27 12:42 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb7ad4e6dd8a8ed9e7ecf83f23030c035a1dd4d9.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox