From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1669C849-D7DC-46C1-B6B6-F2C79C819710@oracle.com>
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 16:49 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi-
>
> > On Jun 17, 2021, at 7:26 PM, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> >
> > When flushing out the unstable file writes as part of a COMMIT
> > call, try
> > to perform most of of the data writes and waits outside the
> > semaphore.
> >
> > This means that if the client is sending the COMMIT as part of a
> > memory
> > reclaim operation, then it can continue performing I/O, with
> > contention
> > for the lock occurring only once the data sync is finished.
> >
> > Fixes: 5011af4c698a ("nfsd: Fix stable writes")
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
>
> The good news is I've found no functional regressions. The bad
> news is I haven't seen any difference in performance. Is there
> a particular test that I can run to observe improvement?
I'd expect that re-exported NFS would be the best test since fsync() is
a high latency operation when the page cache is loaded. You also want
to use a client with relatively limited memory so that it will try to
reclaim memory by pushing out dirty pages and doing COMMIT.
>
> I wonder about adding a Fixes: tag for a change that the patch
> description describes as an optimization.
I've occasionally hit OOM situations in the re-export case when the r/w
lock contention causes softerr failure to be serialised.
i.e. if the server is down, and you're essentially hoping that the nfsd
threads will give up and return EJUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY to the client,
then that lock ensures that threads fail one-by-one (grab lock, write,
timeout, release lock) instead of being able to all fail at once
(write, timeout).
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index 15adf1f6ab21..46485c04740d 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -1123,6 +1123,19 @@ nfsd_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp, loff_t offset,
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
> > +static int
> > +nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t
> > offset,
> > + loff_t end)
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping = nf->nf_file->f_mapping;
> > + int ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset, end);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors(mapping, offset, end);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Commit all pending writes to stable storage.
> > *
> > @@ -1153,10 +1166,11 @@ nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp,
> > if (err)
> > goto out;
> > if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export)) {
> > - int err2;
> > + int err2 = nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(nf,
> > offset, end);
> >
> > down_write(&nf->nf_rwsem);
> > - err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset, end,
> > 0);
> > + if (!err2)
> > + err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset,
> > end, 0);
> > switch (err2) {
> > case 0:
> > nfsd_copy_boot_verifier(verf,
> > net_generic(nf->nf_net,
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 23:26 [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem trondmy
2021-06-18 17:59 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 16:49 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 18:00 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2021-06-21 18:27 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 19:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-21 19:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-22 14:51 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-23 21:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox