public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:00:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1669C849-D7DC-46C1-B6B6-F2C79C819710@oracle.com>

On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 16:49 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi-
> 
> > On Jun 17, 2021, at 7:26 PM, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> > 
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > 
> > When flushing out the unstable file writes as part of a COMMIT
> > call, try
> > to perform most of of the data writes and waits outside the
> > semaphore.
> > 
> > This means that if the client is sending the COMMIT as part of a
> > memory
> > reclaim operation, then it can continue performing I/O, with
> > contention
> > for the lock occurring only once the data sync is finished.
> > 
> > Fixes: 5011af4c698a ("nfsd: Fix stable writes")
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> 
> The good news is I've found no functional regressions. The bad
> news is I haven't seen any difference in performance. Is there
> a particular test that I can run to observe improvement?

I'd expect that re-exported NFS would be the best test since fsync() is
a high latency operation when the page cache is loaded. You also want
to use a client with relatively limited memory so that it will try to
reclaim memory by pushing out dirty pages and doing COMMIT.

> 
> I wonder about adding a Fixes: tag for a change that the patch
> description describes as an optimization.

I've occasionally hit OOM situations in the re-export case when the r/w
lock contention causes softerr failure to be serialised.
i.e. if the server is down, and you're essentially hoping that the nfsd
threads will give up and return EJUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY to the client,
then that lock ensures that threads fail one-by-one (grab lock, write,
timeout, release lock) instead of being able to all fail at once
(write, timeout).

> 
> 
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index 15adf1f6ab21..46485c04740d 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -1123,6 +1123,19 @@ nfsd_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp, loff_t offset,
> > }
> > 
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
> > +static int
> > +nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t
> > offset,
> > +                                 loff_t end)
> > +{
> > +       struct address_space *mapping = nf->nf_file->f_mapping;
> > +       int ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset, end);
> > +
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> > +       filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors(mapping, offset, end);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> >  * Commit all pending writes to stable storage.
> >  *
> > @@ -1153,10 +1166,11 @@ nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> > svc_fh *fhp,
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto out;
> >         if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export)) {
> > -               int err2;
> > +               int err2 = nfsd_filemap_write_and_wait_range(nf,
> > offset, end);
> > 
> >                 down_write(&nf->nf_rwsem);
> > -               err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset, end,
> > 0);
> > +               if (!err2)
> > +                       err2 = vfs_fsync_range(nf->nf_file, offset,
> > end, 0);
> >                 switch (err2) {
> >                 case 0:
> >                         nfsd_copy_boot_verifier(verf,
> > net_generic(nf->nf_net,
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-21 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17 23:26 [PATCH] nfsd: Reduce contention for the nfsd_file nf_rwsem trondmy
2021-06-18 17:59 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 16:49 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 18:00   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2021-06-21 18:27     ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-21 19:06       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-21 19:35         ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-22 14:51 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-23 21:38 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff7400e35ec0b227de4546c608d231caed921d5b.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox