From: Pavel <free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:13:21 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20111130T104304-71@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 46156F3F.3070606@redhat.com
Wendy Cheng <wcheng <at> redhat.com> writes:
>
> Revised patches based on 2.6.21-rc4 kernel and nfs-utils-1.1.0-rc1 that
> address issues discussed in:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00034.html
>
> Quick How-to:
> 1) Failover server exports filesystem with "fsid" option as:
> /etc/exports entry> /mnt/shared/exports *(fsid=1234,sync,rw)
> 2) Failover server dispatch rpc.statd with "-H" option.
> 3) Failover server drops locks based on fsid by:
> shell> echo 1234 > /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_unlock
> 4) Takeover server enters per fsid grace period by:
> shell> echo 1234 > /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_igrace
> 5) Takeover server notifies clients for lock reclaim by:
> shell> /usr/sbin/sm-notify -f -v floating_ip_address -P an_sm_directory
>
> Patch Summary:
> 4-1: implement /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_unlock
> 4-2: implement /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_igrace
> 4-3: correctly record and pass incoming server ip interface into rpc.statd.
> 4-4: nfs-utils statd changes
> 4-1 includes an existing lockd bug fix as discussed in:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?
thread_name=4603506D.5040807%40redhat.com&forum_name=nfs
> (subject: [NFS] Question about f_count in struct nlm_file)
> 4-4 includes an existing nfs-utils statd bug fix as discussed in:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?
msg_name=46142B4F.1030507%40redhat.com
> (subject: Re: [NFS] lockd and statd)
>
> Misc:
> o No IPV6 support due to testing efforts
> o NFS V3 only - will compare notes with CITI folks (NFS V4 issues)
> o Still need some error-inject tests.
>
Hi everyone!
I'm building an A/A cluster using NFS v3 and local file systems, and looking for
efficient ways for failover (for now I have to restart nfs-kernel-server on
Takeover node to be able to initiate grace period), so the discussed solutions
are very interesting to me.
Now (4 years after) in current nfs-utils packages (v. 1.2.2-4 and later) I can
see that the ability to release locks was really implemented and is working well
(I mean interfaces /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_ip and /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem),
but how about reacquiring locks on the node, share migrates to? - I've been
going through various mailing lists and found a lot of discussions on the topic
(also dated mainly 2007), but don't seem to find any rpc-based mechanism or
interface like /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_grace to do that, was it ever made?
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 21:50 [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover Wendy Cheng
2007-04-11 17:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-17 19:30 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 18:56 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 19:46 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-19 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-19 15:08 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-19 7:04 ` [Cluster-devel] " Neil Brown
2007-04-19 14:53 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-24 3:30 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-24 5:52 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-26 4:35 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-26 5:43 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 2:24 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 6:00 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 12:40 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 13:42 ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-27 15:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 15:36 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 16:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 22:22 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-29 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-29 23:10 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-30 5:19 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-05-04 18:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-04 21:35 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 20:34 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-28 3:55 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-28 4:51 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-28 5:26 ` Marc Eshel
2007-04-28 12:33 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-27 15:12 ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-25 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 14:10 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:21 ` Marc Eshel
2007-04-25 15:19 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:39 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 15:52 ` Wendy Cheng
2011-11-30 10:13 ` Pavel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20111130T104304-71@post.gmane.org \
--to=free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).