From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>,
autofs@linux.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [autofs] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
Date: 18 Sep 2003 01:52:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <shsd6dyabju.fsf@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030917210023.GA15099@suse.de>
>>>>> " " == Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 17, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Okay... let me ask this so I get it straight...
>>
>> Has anyone seen this (busy inodes after stopping the
>> automounter) using autofs v3 kernel module and daemon?
> I'm not sure, but everyone who has seen this should fiddle this
> patch into the kernel and see how it goes. The whole thing
> started very recently (post 2.4.21) for us.
> This patch is untested, any feedback appreciated.
...and is indeed wrong... It does the exact opposite of what
sillydelete should do. Instead of causing the last application that
closes the file to perform the sillydelete, you are asking the *first*
application that closes it to do so.
Sillydelete *has* to be tied to dentries. Not files, and not
inodes. It is purely a namespace operation...
So exactly what are you trying to do, and why?
Cheers,
Trond
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-18 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0309171251290.25153-100000@wombat.indigo.net.au>
[not found] ` <3F689E40.6090802@intel.com>
[not found] ` <3F68C6EB.2080706@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <20030917210023.GA15099@suse.de>
2003-09-18 5:52 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2003-09-18 8:26 ` Re: [autofs] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP Olaf Kirch
2003-09-25 23:17 ` Matt C
2003-09-26 0:24 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <200309261831.h8QIVNVw026806@buggy.badula.org>
2003-09-26 22:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-27 16:55 ` Olaf Kirch
2003-09-28 23:16 ` Steve Fosdick
2003-09-29 12:07 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-29 17:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-30 12:50 ` Olaf Kirch
2003-09-30 13:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-29 3:27 ` Frank Cusack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=shsd6dyabju.fsf@charged.uio.no \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox