Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Ext2 devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	NFS maillist <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [NFS] htree+NFS (NFS client bug?)
Date: 27 Nov 2002 23:44:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <shslm3e4or2.fsf@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021127205554.J2948@redhat.com>

>>>>> " " == Stephen C Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> writes:

    >> If glibc issued a new readdir request (which is what I suspect
    >> has happened here), the NFS client has no idea what the
    >> previous reply was

     > Well, glibc will *always* issue another readdir, because the
     > only way we can ever tell glibc that we're at EOF on the
     > directory is when we eventually return 0 from getdents.  The
     > question about client behaviour is, if we've already been told
     > that the stream is at EOF, should the client simply discard
     > that info and keep reading regardless, or should it cache the
     > EOF status?

We could possibly cache the EOF status by overloading some other field
in the struct file. f_version comes to mind as a useful candidate,
since it automatically gets reset by llseek.

Cheers,
  Trond

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-27 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-26 23:44 htree+NFS (NFS client bug?) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2002-11-27  3:26 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
2002-11-27  2:59   ` [Ext2-devel] " chrisl
2002-11-27  8:58   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2002-11-27 15:00     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-27 20:25       ` [Ext2-devel] " Trond Myklebust
2002-11-27 20:55         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-27 22:44           ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2002-11-28 16:41             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-28 16:58               ` Trond Myklebust
2002-11-28 17:09                 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-28 17:57                   ` Trond Myklebust
2002-11-28 16:44           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-28 17:13             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-11-28 17:44               ` Trond Myklebust
2002-11-28 20:00               ` [Ext2-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2002-11-28  2:07       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2002-11-28  2:46         ` Trond Myklebust
2002-11-27 13:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-11-27 20:42   ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=shslm3e4or2.fsf@charged.uio.no \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox