Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>
Cc: "'jason andrade'" <jason@dstc.edu.au>,  nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: nfs performance: read only/gigE/nolock/1Tb per day
Date: 22 Apr 2002 17:32:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <shssn5noik3.fsf@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E50CEB5@black.eng.netapp.com>

>>>>> " " == Charles Lever <Lever> writes:

     > i'm looking at a similar problem (1K rsize works, but 8K rsize
     > doesn't behave under load; only a server reboot will fix the
     > problem).  the environment is also a web server running an NFS
     > client, but the back-end is a NetApp filer.  the NFS traffic
     > goes over a private switched 100MB network.

     > try with NFSv3 and TCP.  my guess is you have a network problem
     > of some kind that causes packet loss.  this triggers the UDP
     > timeout/recovery mechanism which will slow you down and maybe
     > even get the server and client out of sync with each other.
     > you might also check your GbE settings -- flow control should
     > be enabled, and make sure both ends of all your links have
     > identically configured autonegotiation parameters.

     > (trond- losing sync may be a client problem since it appears to
     > happen with different server implementations.  what can we do
     > to get better information about this?)

I'm not sure what you mean by this. There is no 'sync' with UDP: each
packet going down the wire is either a UDP header or a fragment.

What might perhaps be happening is that the cards are somehow getting
messed up due to data flooding. Have you tried playing around with
driver parameters such as 'max_interrupt_work', 'max_rx_desc' and/or
other interrupt-related variables? (see 'modinfo -p <module>' for the
list of supported paramenters)

Cheers,
  Trond

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-22 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22 14:49 nfs performance: read only/gigE/nolock/1Tb per day Lever, Charles
2002-04-22 15:32 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2002-04-22 18:52   ` Bogdan Costescu
2002-04-23 10:39     ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-23 15:14       ` Bogdan Costescu
2002-04-23 16:36         ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-23 18:16           ` Bogdan Costescu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-22 21:45 Heflin, Roger A.
2002-04-22 16:23 Andrew Ryan
2002-04-22 18:06 ` Pedro M. Rodrigues
2002-04-21 13:08 Gavin Woodhatch
2002-04-21  3:27 jason andrade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=shssn5noik3.fsf@charged.uio.no \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
    --cc=jason@dstc.edu.au \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox