From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: Nilfs 2.0.1 fails to mount a nilfs-2.0.0 filesystem Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:12:09 +0900 Message-ID: <1206360729.7809.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080324125404.f299fbe2.nilfs@blinkenlights.ch> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080324125404.f299fbe2.nilfs-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: NILFS Users mailing list Hi, On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 12:54 +0100, Adrian Ulrich wrote: > Hi, > > I've just upgraded from nilfs 2.0.0 to 2.0.1 (kernel + userland) and noticed > that nilfs 2.0.1 fails to mount my 2.0.0 filesystem: > > > NILFS: Invalid checkpoint (checkpoint number=12178) > > NILFS: error loading a checkpoint (checkpoint number=12178). > > Mounting the filesystem with nilfs-2.0.0 works just fine. > > Is this a bug or did the disk-format change in 2.0.1 ? It seems to be an unintended regression. Please wait until further notice. I'll look into the problem. -- Ryusuke Konishi NILFS team NTT http://www.nilfs.org/