From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava-yeENwD64cLxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs-utils: Work around uncleanable full filesystem
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:14:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358234057.2105.12.camel@slavad-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358178899-26347-1-git-send-email-sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 16:54 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> The filesystem can end up in a state were the filesystem is full and the
> returned ss_nongc_ctime is smaller than sui_lastmod of all reclaimable
> segments. The garbage collector will not clean anything and therefore no new
> room for new files will be available and ss_nongc_ctime/sui_lastmod will not be
> updated without using special tools. This makes the filesystem unusable without
> manual recovery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>
> --
> This problem appeared on a current 3.2 stable kernel (Debian Wheezy build). I
> am not an FS developer and have therefore not much background knowledge about
> the NILFS codebase. Nevertheless, this problem hit me quite hard after creating
> some files on a nilfs partition until it was full and deleting them again.
>
> $ for i in `seq 0 150`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=foo$i count=22528; done
> $ rm foo*
>
> Looking at the output debugging output using
>
> $ watch -n .5 'df -h;tail /var/log/syslog;'
>
> clearly showed that it was not finding any segments to delete. The only problem
> I could find was the threshold. After "removing" this threshold, I was able to
> get some clear segments again. I personally cannot explain why the check is
> there at all. Maybe there is a good reason but the comment above it didn't help
> much.
>
> So, here for completeness the threshold: 1358164666 (aka: Mon Jan 14 12:57:46
> CET 2013)
>
> And here are the output of lssu and lscp:
>
> $ lssu --all
> SEGNUM DATE TIME STAT NBLOCKS
> 0 2013-01-14 12:58:23 -d- 2047
> 1 2013-01-14 12:58:23 -d- 2048
[snip]
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> sbin/cleanerd/cleanerd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sbin/cleanerd/cleanerd.c b/sbin/cleanerd/cleanerd.c
> index bfcd893..12ed975 100644
> --- a/sbin/cleanerd/cleanerd.c
> +++ b/sbin/cleanerd/cleanerd.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ nilfs_cleanerd_select_segments(struct nilfs_cleanerd *cleanerd,
> * selected. */
> thr = (config->cf_selection_policy.p_threshold != 0) ?
> config->cf_selection_policy.p_threshold :
> - sustat->ss_nongc_ctime;
> + ~0ULL;
>
As I understand the code of nilfs_cleanerd, this code is correct without
your changing. The ss_nongc_ctime is the creation time of the last
segment not for GC. When thr is set then it compared with sui_lastmod.
The sui_lastmod is the timestamp of last modification. So, the
nilfs_cleanerd works right.
I think that this is a bug on the kernel side. My current vision is that
in some environment the ns_nongc_ctime can be not updated correctly. So,
you have such threshold that prevent from segments clearing.
Thank you for the issue report.
With the best regards,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
> for (segnum = 0; segnum < sustat->ss_nsegs; segnum += n) {
> count = (sustat->ss_nsegs - segnum < NILFS_CLEANERD_NSUINFO) ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-15 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 15:54 [PATCH] nilfs-utils: Work around uncleanable full filesystem Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <1358178899-26347-1-git-send-email-sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-14 19:49 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
[not found] ` <37A149BD-4D8E-4C55-9301-428034C5B9DA-yeENwD64cLxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-14 18:55 ` Sven Eckelmann
2013-01-15 7:14 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2013-01-15 8:34 ` Sven Eckelmann
2013-01-15 10:43 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <201301151043.AA04492-ZdTO5nnmHvkOizVVqyxoihMFgDP4sedm@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-15 13:48 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-01-15 13:57 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-01-15 15:17 ` Sven Eckelmann
2013-01-17 7:57 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-01-17 8:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2013-01-17 9:19 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-01-18 7:04 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-01-18 6:17 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358234057.2105.12.camel@slavad-ubuntu \
--to=slava-yeenwd64clxbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sven-KaDOiPu9UxWEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox