From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: error on kernel 2.6.29 while running cleaner on a 1tb volume Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:20:05 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090327.152005.04656990.ryusuke@osrg.net> References: <20090326.021932.61004088.ryusuke@osrg.net> <49CC6193.9040900@prnet.org> <49CC6A6C.9060006@prnet.org> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49CC6A6C.9060006-/LHdS3kC8BfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, admin-/LHdS3kC8BfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Hi, On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:55:56 +0100, David Arendt wrote: > Hi, > > one thing I forgot to mention, in /etc/nilfs_cleanerd.conf I changed > n_segments_per clean to 20 in order to clean faster when running the > cleaner manually. Could this have any influence ? Yes, maybe. It raises memory pressure then may induce unusual path of execution like cache invalidation. It may even increase the chance of revealing underlying problems in relocation of on-disk blocks. Decreasing cleaning_interval is safer in general. We'll try the condition. Regards, Ryusuke