From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Benchmark between EXT3/4, Btrfs,
	Nilfs and XFS (article)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:27:45 +0200
Message-ID: <20090629092745.GC14991@aardappel.13thmonkey.org>
References: <8641fd7c0906290135g4ce4f2c0veb85239ee1363d5c@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list <users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8641fd7c0906290135g4ce4f2c0veb85239ee1363d5c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: <linux-nilfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users>,
	<mailto:users-request-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.nilfs.org/pipermail/users>
List-Post: <mailto:users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users>,
	<mailto:users-request-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
To: NILFS Users mailing list <users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:35:36AM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> Maybe you've already read it but for those who haven't:
> 
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_btrfs_nilfs2&num=1

It just shows that NiLFS is better suited for SSD media :) I predict SSD will
replace the older harddisc technology in the end. Its just waiting for volume
and flash chips getting bigger and cheaper.

With regards,
Reinoud