From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: Crash... Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:47:59 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090724.194759.112623624.ryusuke@osrg.net> References: <9cdbb57f0907231402i1a92cb4qfe5a9d81346a4665@mail.gmail.com> <20090724085803.GA23256@aardappel.13thmonkey.org> <9cdbb57f0907240247n5ffd6f81yaee39eb386516c25@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9cdbb57f0907240247n5ffd6f81yaee39eb386516c25-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, andrea.gelmini-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:47:21 +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > 2009/7/24 Reinoud Zandijk : > > 1024 is lower than the page size so that might explain a lot! I think its a > > missing check in the mkfs.nilfs2 to never allow lower values than the page > > size for block size.... but Ryusuke can better answer that :-D > > I agree with you, but man page of mkfs.nilfs2 says it can be > 1024/2048/4096/8192. > Of course it can't be > of page size, but that's a VFS problem. Exactly. > Ciao, > Andrea Cheers, Ryusuke Konishi