From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: proper name for userspace package? Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:32:34 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090731.023234.56054455.ryusuke@osrg.net> References: <4A71CA72.8080106@redhat.com> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A71CA72.8080106-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, sandeen-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: Daniel Baumann (Cc added to Debian maintainer) On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:29:38 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I'm wondering what the preferred name is for the userspace package. > > The tarball is "nilfs-utils" but debian has "nilfs2-tools" - is there a > preference, or is this a debian convention that caused the rename? > > Thanks, > -Eric I don't know the how and why. The btrfs was also packaged with the "-tools" convention in Debian. On the one hand, we can see all the convensions like "-utils", "-tools", and "progs" there. Personally, I like the "-tools" convension for new ones. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi