From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: pp (protection period) mount option Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:02:05 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20091202.010205.38314732.ryusuke@osrg.net> References: <20091128.012303.54434171.ryusuke@osrg.net> <749598c60911281316i40b591b1hcb055b0867617f0e@mail.gmail.com> <20091202.004422.69931110.ryusuke@osrg.net> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091202.004422.69931110.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: david-0RIiUExYzkzCfDggNXIi3w@public.gmane.org Cc: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:44:22 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Hi, > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:16:31 +0100, David Smid > wrote: > > Thanks you for your valuable comments. > > > > You are right, of course. No kernel code changes are needed. > > Here is my take #2. > > > > David > > Thank you, David. I reviewed the patch in detail, and no worrisome > point found. > > During tests, I noticed that remount doesn't work for this option: > > For instance, after doing > > # mount -t nilfs2 -o pp=3D600 /dev/sdb1 /test > > and > > # mount -t nilfs2 -o remount,pp=3D400 /dev/sdb1 /test Whoa, looks garbled.. > # mount -t nilfs2 -o pp=600 /dev/sdb1 /test > # mount -t nilfs2 -o remount,pp=400 /dev/sdb1 /test Ryusuke