Re: [PATCH 02/12] nilfs2: Storage class should be before const qualifier

[Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:57:47 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser-93Khv+1bN0NyDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org>

Applied. Thank you!

Ryusuke Konishi

> ---
>  fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> index f6af760..d6b2b83 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int nilfs_ioctl_clean_segments(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
>  				      unsigned int cmd, void __user *argp)
>  {
>  	struct nilfs_argv argv[5];
> -	const static size_t argsz[5] = {
> +	static const size_t argsz[5] = {
>  		sizeof(struct nilfs_vdesc),
>  		sizeof(struct nilfs_period),
>  		sizeof(__u64),
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:01:05 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] nilfs2: Storage class should be before const
> >	qualifier
> 
> Sorry, this should jsut have been [PATCH], not [PATCH 02/12]. The
> remaining patches are not targeted at nilfs.
> 
> Cheers, Tobias