From: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
To: debian-qVUaBahCJu5n68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 0 must be clean
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:48:07 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100322.224807.267714142.ryusuke@osrg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100322.153446.180039371.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:34:46 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:04:20 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:04:39 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just tried to benchmark nilfs and then the file system and benchmark
> > > process got stuck. dmesg output is attached. The problems start with
> > >
> > > nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 0 must be clean
> > > nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 1 must be clean
> > > NILFS warning (device sdb1): nilfs_clean_segments: segment construction
> > > failed. (err=-28)
> > >
> > > I'm using
> > >
> > > Kernel 2.6.33 (Debian 2.6.33-1~experimental.2)
> > > nilfs-tools 2.0.16 (Debian 2.0.16-1)
> > >
> > > The processes are unkillable and the file system cannot be unmounted.
> > > The machine will be reset when I get back in physical range on Wednesday
> > > and the stuck file system will be removed. If there is anything I can do
> > > remotely to help you debug that problem before the file system is gone,
> > > let me know.
>
> > Thank you for the detail report!
> >
> > I could reproduce the both problems (i.e. the warnings on
> > "nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free" and the hang of cleaner process) by a
> > manual fault injection test.
> >
> > Will look into these issues.
> >
> > Ryusuke Konishi
I've found the cause of the hang-up problem. The following patch would
fix it.
However, please note that the current nilfs cleaner is designed to
keep every change within ``protection period''. If you write a
massive amount of data in a short term, nilfs still would stop with a
disk full and reject new changes until cleaner will make some free
space.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix hang-up of cleaner after log writer returned with error
According to the report from Andreas Beckmann (Message-ID:
<4BA54677.3090902-qVUaBahCJu5n68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>), nilfs in 2.6.33 kernel got stuck
after a disk full error.
This turned out to be a regression by log writer updates merged at
kernel 2.6.33. nilfs_segctor_abort_construction, which is a cleanup
function for erroneous cases, was skipping writeback completion for
some logs.
This fixes the bug and would resolve the hang issue.
Reported-by: Andreas Beckmann <debian-qVUaBahCJu5n68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index b622123..c161d89 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1897,8 +1897,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci,
list_splice_tail_init(&sci->sc_write_logs, &logs);
ret = nilfs_wait_on_logs(&logs);
- if (ret)
- nilfs_abort_logs(&logs, NULL, sci->sc_super_root, ret);
+ nilfs_abort_logs(&logs, NULL, sci->sc_super_root, ret ? : err);
list_splice_tail_init(&sci->sc_segbufs, &logs);
nilfs_cancel_segusage(&logs, nilfs->ns_sufile);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-20 22:04 nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 0 must be clean Andreas Beckmann
[not found] ` <4BA54677.3090902-qVUaBahCJu5n68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-22 6:04 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100322.150420.179960388.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-22 6:34 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100322.153446.180039371.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-22 13:48 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100322.224807.267714142.ryusuke@osrg.net \
--to=ryusuke-sg5x7nla6pw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=debian-qVUaBahCJu5n68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox