From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove BKL uses Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:50:23 +0200 Message-ID: <201007051650.23761.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1278220928-28121-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1278220928-28121-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jan Blunck On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you go through the effort of removing it again. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html