From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
To: dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Split some metadata onto separate device?
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:49:06 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608.224906.85409768.ryusuke@osrg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106081508.39345.dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:08:37 +0200, dexen deVries wrote:
> Hi again,
>
>
> On Wednesday 08 of June 2011 14:58:03 you wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:48:52 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:42:28 +0200, dexen deVries wrote:
> > > > By the way, it seems to me that the in-kernel GC does not attempt to
> > > > de- fragment files. Is that the case? If so, would probably mean
> > > > extents would not help very much for fragmented files. Also, on
> > > > magnetic media, a lot of seeking happens in case of fragmented
> > > > files.
> > >
> > > Yes, but extents will decrease the amount of metadata, and this has
> > > potential for speed up.
> > >
> > > NILFS2 uses 32 bytes metadata per disk block at present. I guess you
> > > know that the number of DAT blocks are actually indispensable through
> > > analysis using the dumpseg tool.
> >
> > Oh, looks confusing. I meant the amount of DAT blocks is not
> > negligible.
>
> Understood ;-)
>
> Anyway, isn't some fragmentation avoidance necessary to profit from extents
> (that we hope we'll use at some point)?
I guess it doesn't become a big issue unless we do many small random
writes like database.
> AFAIK, an extent is only good to describe file blocks if they are laid out
> continuous on the block device.
Yep. And, we know files are enough continuous in most cases.
We use at least 16 bytes per 4 kiro-bytes disk block to point the
block (16KB for 8MB segment); btrees of nilfs2 use an 8 bytes key and
an 8 bytes pointer for a disk block.
In typical case, this can be reduced to 16 bytes per file (16 bytes
for 8MB segment) with the extents.
IMO, 64-bit filesystems have a reasonable reason to adopt extents
though nilfs2 did not apply it.
I guess applying extents to the DAT file is especially effective.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
> Cheers,
> --
> dexen deVries
>
> [[[↓][→]]]
>
> For example, if the first thing in the file is:
> <?kzy irefvba="1.0" rapbqvat="ebg13"?>
> an XML parser will recognize that the document is stored in the traditional
> ROT13 encoding.
>
> (( Joe English, http://www.flightlab.com/~joe/sgml/faq-not.txt ))
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-03 10:29 Split some metadata onto separate device? dexen deVries
[not found] ` <201106031229.38758.dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-03 17:26 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20110604.022621.01482278.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-03 17:42 ` dexen deVries
[not found] ` <201106031942.29133.dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-08 12:48 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20110608.214852.237935973.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-08 12:58 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20110608.215803.224753719.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-08 13:08 ` dexen deVries
[not found] ` <201106081508.39345.dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-08 13:49 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
[not found] ` <20110608.224906.85409768.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-14 11:18 ` Reinoud Zandijk
[not found] ` <20110614111852.GA1263-bVHBekiX4bNgoMqBc1r0ESegHCQxtGRMHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-14 13:18 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110608.224906.85409768.ryusuke@osrg.net \
--to=konishi.ryusuke-zyj7fxus5i5l9jvzuh4aog@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dexen.devries-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox