From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piotr Szymaniak Subject: Re: NILFS: corrupt root inode after Turbo Mode? Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:28:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20121012122829.GH27763@wloczykij> References: <20121008222557.GU28032@wloczykij> <1349767793.3427.7.camel@slavad-ubuntu> <20121009105239.GV28032@wloczykij> <20121012114915.GE7823@csmith-bm.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P7Tqkd/m/Jnohiaz" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121012114915.GE7823-Ng8wz+J301SNY5Lh21HnMTHS2PGA244I9dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Christian Smith Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org --P7Tqkd/m/Jnohiaz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:49:15PM +0100, Christian Smith wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:52:39PM +0200, Piotr Szymaniak wrote: > > It's an ???allowed??? overcloking. I have another SD Card with Raspbian= (and > > without nilfs2) that works fine with Turbo Mode. At least it seems to > > work fine. The second card was in Turbo Mode (@900MHz) for a few days > > and was working. Yesterday i made it @1000MHz and it didn't boot. >=20 > It's allowed in that it no longer invalidates your warranty, but I don't = think > there is any guarantee it will work. >=20 > Overclocking also puts more load on the PSU, so there is potentially less > power available for the SD Card to work with. Perhaps a write failed due > to power issues in Turbo mode? What is your PSU rating? 0.7A is the > recommended amount the PSU should be able to supply. It seems to work fine with Raspbian, so I dubt it's an PSU issue (I've tested Raspbian @1000MHz in the first place). Afair the PSU is 1 or 1,1A, so that should not be a problem. > As an aside, I have also been thinking of using NILFS root, but struggled= to > get the default kernel up and running with an initrd (to load the nilfs2 > module). Did you use a built in nilfs2 driver? Yes, I'm using custom build kernel with build in nilfs2 support (and a lot of stuff cut down since I won't use it (and even if, I can compile them back, right?)). Piotr Szymaniak. --=20 Nie mam problemu z piciem. Bez problemu pije, upijam sie i walam po podlodze. -- R. Williams --P7Tqkd/m/Jnohiaz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQeAztAAoJEEMpAov1cw9leLgP/RSanvgFhx+N3orAYGtgB1IX x0uEDlimf8RAhd4mlLUOdDd56IX+9NILlrq7ltfDNQIfDsN01W9itr2oaIbN1V3w tSEDtAFS3Py8K8Ayb8Vj7/WeXSLqw6j/1+LdHn8lNFN4iVTZe1hxx/0jP6uhaixE Z53PRR9EaDLTxksc7prrdbafLTY4qc06UMB7aRK9qffPRSt3UwZUcOOxvsWthLuC uIbOQJbS/uWPXPk1Zyk04bGlBzURLPY3TAU9jyIFTK+UBG2HBC8w5FQ0uWQwT3T1 /8C5tfKU3CNZhRy0UYjjvTMZLfYxOXNTkhf7qw3J5TDAWpBY3NRuez4JPIjvH+WW VQiqNC5OXh5nLCxyTqDUaLfbWpWYKriM1MmzGUYoIyVewfdYNp+rVnjEM3CeBSco oVPZVbtceP+idbzZqp6UWI8vS7B4zKAJZSm3jdY2PsNdEQuNTzdi0fiKF11S/diW IQLsQfB9A8Rg+eTbk7llzCZtbGQroV5WbkmahfCMZFxLdeqhOpvWjQ/7Fu3aC03K LAkV2NmXjadoDlMyrQdbJY9nwlE+wXqsCGY6feip8UBgfIn1Epw4Un95rGhRBAE6 JWN8tK+8iMoAcFrp4RfiFItjJcLN7RMXGOZscUH9VhW9mfY8+3qmzeIXzZIj7CEa WL6LbaBpthLgh9FBJoqm =Gu/O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P7Tqkd/m/Jnohiaz-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html