From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karel Zak Subject: Re: NILFS2: double uuid Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:53:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20150609085329.GF1992@ws.net.home> References: <20150608094559.GB15702@fritha.org> <20150608100835.GA16569@fritha.org> <55756F17.7080603@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20150609.003127.1516615115859573912.konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150609.003127.1516615115859573912.konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: Heinz Diehl , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:31:27AM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > It looks like the backup super block should be dropped from candidates > if its device size (sbp->s_dev_size) doesn't match the partition size. Yeah, fixed: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=00817742ce360119e079a33e12cf84118ff7c63e Note that workaround is to not use nilfs2 on the last partition or have a tiny gap (1 sector is enough) between last partition and the end of the whole-disk. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html