From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/29] ext4: use sb_bdev_nr_blocks Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 23:29:39 -0700 Message-ID: <202110122328.92B4FC41F4@keescook> References: <20211013051042.1065752-1-hch@lst.de> <20211013051042.1065752-26-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=W+Po2ncML0dagir1ZXD2ovXOKvk/W+c/3o5vm+NA9cQ=; b=QomLyJ/uwXmEgOIdGiIKpgwe7fIN3sqRRqysUR703Xs3YgTlXaMfe2P+HII9dJHv27 pe85K+wWKdH0PewpBtncrX+pK9/vv2ewnDdpNrXhC91Xk/Ncvs9CyiBnb8qEmm15S3FV 6BEJ5rXVDozZ1lv8jDs3uSJtiPb9Dk/ZAAcM0= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211013051042.1065752-26-hch@lst.de> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Coly Li , Mike Snitzer , Song Liu , David Sterba , Josef Bacik , Theodore Ts'o , OGAWA Hirofumi , Dave Kleikamp , Ryusuke Konishi , Anton Altaparmakov , Konstantin Komarov , Phillip Lougher , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:10:38AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Use the sb_bdev_nr_blocks helper instead of open coding it. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index 0775950ee84e3..3dde8be5df490 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -4468,7 +4468,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > goto cantfind_ext4; > > /* check blocks count against device size */ > - blocks_count = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; > + blocks_count = sb_bdev_nr_blocks(sb); Is s_blocksize_bits always 9 here? If not, this isn't equivalent. -Kees > if (blocks_count && ext4_blocks_count(es) > blocks_count) { > ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "bad geometry: block count %llu " > "exceeds size of device (%llu blocks)", > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Kees Cook