From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/89] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:35:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20230710-zudem-entkam-bb508cbd8c78@brauner> References: <20230705185812.579118-1-jlayton@kernel.org> <5e40891f6423feb5b68f025e31f26e9a50ae9390.camel@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1688992570; bh=H2xgbjqXpjCIL1YrRX5e2Lm0dCE6nhNpxkhLzNT5ua0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GYBFwi445q0lt0ZphYZpLmOt5wR+meJbqPSRhxet7P0iiPRYgnHSi9LobGg38wRHk YRw3H+QXcyvvByqsJ+4wCmkCN6cf2UfzMYa1sqxLulNzp2UeGTyc0ij28Jne5oQ1T1 3RwWXPXG0ww5I/wkFqIbXj1fKOk/tlA6pnousvcLf4fNGPnso9ohJABAD43u0T4XNZ 4qx5bhLf1Dg7cYvF3ikt77ixrICUwaQpwn/PA/WiTF+kWZvjsjd1ey6AFXxc5U5x4u 9w1gOuNArxobHqFss0Ukd6pKRPqY5GTMTdaOCIUwXl2G+JmZTqpL3AJhz3XT+Fb/gm tN6yuNjSBVu7g== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e40891f6423feb5b68f025e31f26e9a50ae9390.camel@kernel.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jeff Layton Cc: jk@ozlabs.org, arnd@arndb.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arve@android.com, tkjos@android.com, maco@android.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, cmllamas@google.com, surenb@google.com, dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, bwarrum@linux.ibm.com, rituagar@linux.ibm.com, ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, asmadeus@codewreck.org, linux_oss@crudebyte.com, dsterba@suse.com, dhowells@redhat.com, marc.dionne@auristor.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, raven@themaw.net, luisbg@kernel.org, salah.triki@gmail.com, aivazian.tigran@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, keescook@chromium.org, clm@fb.co On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 08:42:31AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 14:58 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > v2: > > - prepend patches to add missing ctime updates > > - add simple_rename_timestamp helper function > > - rename ctime accessor functions as inode_get_ctime/inode_set_ctime_* > > - drop individual inode_ctime_set_{sec,nsec} helpers > > > > After review by Jan and others, and Jan's ext4 rework, the diff on top > of the series I posted a couple of days ago is below. I don't really > want to spam everyone with another ~100 patch v3 series, but I can if > you think that's best. > > Christian, what would you like me to do here? I picked up the series from the list and folded the fixups you posted here into the respective fs conversion patches. I hope that helps you avoid a resend. You should have received a separate "thank you" mail for all of this. To each patch that I folded one of the fixlets from below into I added a git note that records a link to your mail here and the respective patch hunk from this mail that I folded into the patch. git.kernel.org will show notes by default. For example, https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/commit/?h=vfs.ctime&id=8b0e3c2e99004609a16ba145bcbdfdddb78e220e should show you the note I added. You can also fetch them via git fetch $remote refs/notes/*:refs/notes/* (You probably know that ofc but jic.) if you're interested. Based on v6.5-rc1 as of today. Btw, both b4 and patchwork somehow treat the series in weird was. IOW, based on the message id of the cover letter I was able to pull most messages except for: [07/92] fs: add ctime accessors infrastructure [08/92] fs: new helper: simple_rename_timestamp [92/92] fs: rename i_ctime field to __i_ctime which I pulled in separately. Not sure what the cause of this is.