From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4AB191F89; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 06:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730874876; cv=none; b=n4Ka3mt0W8QTt41b2KL+tZUrGXLbIxZvfScQynGAzqdfxD32jsNgoDk+jzIuSF/0vlLvq1cA2iL+4xuX/ktggoGIKQrsmBNK0RQhP3TsBJqXy+M1f83sVB0Sfq3wBsxrNHbnH3a/c8fyvDiqhorP4oWCKuUoz8fk+8XSeUt2I/0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730874876; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aiIt6g4a5lyagB3+YDLezIbtzJW/GBeS2kN7mBoFm0I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lMBwwpZWcYgqK1ZzwpMrUJE8kNkqpInvcu71CX3TVZLD3JlPdV+xcVcY0Rbds3w24UhHpqcSk2vQFbzxaSk3cMLLg8/vg4xNBpC7yw46DrL6xlUobbfLU8wgUdxoj7Ynjs1sGRsXNCpSD4NZeFqWi5RiYzu6B3COJwgLS99RJXM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=k7u49xqi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="k7u49xqi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1836CC4CECD; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 06:34:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1730874875; bh=aiIt6g4a5lyagB3+YDLezIbtzJW/GBeS2kN7mBoFm0I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k7u49xqiYIRCopmZcuBXZMaHrimeqvjznh1apHCnuHJz0w3JJfbHYYX64Fy6zuavi WTle0LKvDCGgdbwcGYCxnafpf3D4QERV0NjDmSAPDmGxmi+z88Sc+Z96pTAmEtm64T 0RBR69741bf6n/PbeC8TKpo199+Qndg+RVh60IDk= Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:34:17 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+d6ca2daf692c7a82f959@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Andrew Morton , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag" failed to apply to v6.6-stable tree Message-ID: <2024110608-shut-strenuous-04c8@gregkh> References: <20241106020945.172057-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:21:39PM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > Hi Sasha > > About 6 hours ago, I posted an adjusted patch to the list (and to > Greg) that allows for backporting of this patch to 6.6-stable and > earlier. > > The patch is titled "[PATCH 4.19 5.4 5.10 5.15 6.1 6.6] nilfs2: fix > kernel bug due to missing clearing of checked flag". > > (or https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241105235654.15044-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com ) > > Normally, Greg would pick up the adjusted patch and apply it, and it > would be backported without any problems, but if the backport of the > adjusted patch I requested has been rejected, I would like to ask for > your confirmation. > > If it is a misunderstanding, I will wait for Greg's work, but is the > process different from usual? I got it now, thanks! greg k-h