From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot <syzbot+9982fb8d18eba905abe2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, bugreport@valiantsec.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix null-ptr-deref in block_touch_buffer tracepoint
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 01:07:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241106160811.3316-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106160811.3316-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
It has been reported that when using "block:block_touch_buffer"
tracepoint, touch_buffer() called from __nilfs_get_folio_block() causes
a NULL pointer dereference, or a general protection fault when KASAN is
enabled.
This happens because since the tracepoint was added in touch_buffer(),
it references the dev_t member bh->b_bdev->bd_dev regardless of whether
the buffer head has a pointer to a block_device structure. In the
current implementation, the block_device structure is set after the
function returns to the caller.
Here, touch_buffer() is used to mark the folio/page that owns the buffer
head as accessed, but the common search helper for folio/page used by
the caller function was optimized to mark the folio/page as accessed
when it was reimplemented a long time ago, eliminating the need to call
touch_buffer() here in the first place.
So this solves the issue by eliminating the touch_buffer() call itself.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Ubisectech Sirius <bugreport@valiantsec.com>
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/86bd3013-887e-4e38-960f-ca45c657f032.bugreport@valiantsec.com
Reported-by: syzbot+9982fb8d18eba905abe2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9982fb8d18eba905abe2
Fixes: 5305cb830834 ("block: add block_{touch|dirty}_buffer tracepoint")
Tested-by: syzbot+9982fb8d18eba905abe2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/nilfs2/page.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/page.c b/fs/nilfs2/page.c
index e48079ebe939..bdc4b152f6e9 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/page.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/page.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ static struct buffer_head *__nilfs_get_folio_block(struct folio *folio,
first_block = (unsigned long)index << (PAGE_SHIFT - blkbits);
bh = get_nth_bh(bh, block - first_block);
- touch_buffer(bh);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
return bh;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 17:45 [syzbot] [nilfs?] general protection fault in touch_buffer syzbot
2024-11-06 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] nilfs2: fix null-ptr-deref bugs on block tracepoints Ryusuke Konishi
2024-11-06 16:07 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
2024-11-06 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] nilfs2: fix null-ptr-deref in block_dirty_buffer tracepoint Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241106160811.3316-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--to=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugreport@valiantsec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+9982fb8d18eba905abe2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox