From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: report the correct read/write dio alignment for reflinked inodes
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:18:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108151827.GA24499@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571d96ad-d9fe-4c76-8f05-1e487244b388@oracle.com>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:13:02AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/01/2025 08:55, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> @@ -580,9 +580,24 @@ xfs_report_dioalign(
>> struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
>> struct block_device *bdev = target->bt_bdev;
>> - stat->result_mask |= STATX_DIOALIGN;
>> + stat->result_mask |= STATX_DIOALIGN | STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN;
>
> BTW, it would be a crappy userspace which can't handle fields which it did
> not ask for, e.g. asked for STATX_DIOALIGN, but got STATX_DIOALIGN and
> STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN
Well, the space is marked for extension. I don't think there ever
was a requirement only fields asked for are reported, but if that
feels safer I could switch to that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 8:55 add STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: reformat the statx definition Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:08 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: add STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:09 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: cleanup xfs_vn_getattr Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: report the correct read/write dio alignment for reflinked inodes Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:10 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 10:13 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-08 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-08 17:53 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-09 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: report larger dio alignment for COW inodes Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:11 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-08 8:59 ` [PATCH] statx.2: document STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-09 8:31 add STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: report the correct read/write dio alignment for reflinked inodes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108151827.GA24499@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).