From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: reject zero bd_oblocknr in nilfs_ioctl_mark_blocks_dirty()
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 02:52:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331175253.32329-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
nilfs_ioctl_mark_blocks_dirty() uses bd_oblocknr to detect dead blocks
by comparing it with the current block number bd_blocknr. If they differ,
the block is considered dead and skipped.
However, bd_oblocknr should never be 0 since block 0 typically stores the
primary superblock and is never a valid GC target block. A corrupted ioctl
request with bd_oblocknr set to 0 causes the comparison to incorrectly
match when the lookup returns -ENOENT and sets bd_blocknr to 0, bypassing
the dead block check and calling nilfs_bmap_mark() on a non-existent
block. This causes nilfs_btree_do_lookup() to return -ENOENT, triggering
the WARN_ON(ret == -ENOENT).
Fix this by rejecting ioctl requests with bd_oblocknr set to 0 at the
beginning of each iteration.
[ryusuke: slightly modified the commit message and comments for accuracy]
Fixes: 7942b919f732 ("nilfs2: ioctl operations")
Reported-by: syzbot+98a040252119df0506f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=98a040252119df0506f8
Suggested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <Kartikey406@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+466a45fcfb0562f5b9a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=466a45fcfb0562f5b9a0
Cc: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
---
Hi Viacheslav,
Please add this to the queue for the next cycle. This fixes assertion
failures that can occur with broken GC ioctl calls recently discovered
by syzbot.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
index e17b8da66491..e0a606643e87 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
@@ -736,6 +736,12 @@ static int nilfs_ioctl_mark_blocks_dirty(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
int ret, i;
for (i = 0; i < nmembs; i++) {
+ /*
+ * bd_oblocknr must never be 0 as block 0
+ * is never a valid GC target block
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!bdescs[i].bd_oblocknr))
+ return -EINVAL;
/* XXX: use macro or inline func to check liveness */
ret = nilfs_bmap_lookup_at_level(bmap,
bdescs[i].bd_offset,
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 17:52 Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
2026-03-31 18:08 ` [PATCH] nilfs2: reject zero bd_oblocknr in nilfs_ioctl_mark_blocks_dirty() Viacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331175253.32329-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--to=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=junjie.cao@linux.dev \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox