From: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi
<konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] nilfs2: add nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo to update segment usage
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EB7795.6020407@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131.175825.168035651.konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
On 2014-01-31 09:58, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:42:49 +0100, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> This patch introduces the nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo function, which
>> expects an array of nilfs_suinfo_update structures and updates the
>> segment usage information accordingly.
>>
>> This is basically a helper function for the newly introduced
>> NILFS_IOCTL_SET_SUINFO ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> fs/nilfs2/sufile.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/nilfs2/sufile.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
>> index 3127e9f..5ad5d4c 100644
>> --- a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
>> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
>> @@ -870,6 +870,137 @@ ssize_t nilfs_sufile_get_suinfo(struct inode *sufile, __u64 segnum, void *buf,
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + * nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo - sets segment usage info
>> + * @sufile: inode of segment usage file
>> + * @buf: array of suinfo_update
>> + * @supsz: byte size of suinfo_update
>> + * @nsup: size of suinfo_update array
>> + *
>> + * Description: Takes an array of nilfs_suinfo_update structs and updates
>> + * segment usage accordingly. Only the fields indicated by the sup_flags
>> + * are updated.
>> + *
>> + * Return Value: On success, 0 is returned. On error, one of the
>> + * following negative error codes is returned.
>> + *
>> + * %-EIO - I/O error.
>> + *
>> + * %-ENOMEM - Insufficient amount of memory available.
>> + *
>> + * %-EINVAL - Invalid values in input (segment number, flags or nblocks)
>> + */
>> +ssize_t nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo(struct inode *sufile, void *buf,
>> + unsigned supsz, size_t nsup)
>> +{
>> + struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sufile->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>> + struct buffer_head *header_bh, *bh;
>> + struct nilfs_suinfo_update *sup, *supend = buf + supsz * nsup;
>> + struct nilfs_segment_usage *su;
>> + void *kaddr;
>> + unsigned long blkoff, prev_blkoff;
>> + int cleansi, cleansu, dirtysi, dirtysu;
>> + unsigned long ncleaned = 0, ndirtied = 0;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(nsup == 0))
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + for (sup = buf; sup < supend; sup = (void *)sup + supsz) {
>> + if (sup->sup_segnum >= nilfs->ns_nsegments
>> + || (sup->sup_flags &
>> + (~0UL << __NR_NILFS_SUINFO_UPDATE_FIELDS))
>> + || (nilfs_suinfo_update_nblocks(sup) &&
>> + sup->sup_sui.sui_nblocks >
>> + nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + down_write(&NILFS_MDT(sufile)->mi_sem);
>> +
>> + ret = nilfs_sufile_get_header_block(sufile, &header_bh);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_sem;
>> +
>> + sup = buf;
>> + blkoff = nilfs_sufile_get_blkoff(sufile, sup->sup_segnum);
>> + ret = nilfs_mdt_get_block(sufile, blkoff, 1, NULL, &bh);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_header;
>> +
>> + for (;;) {
>> + kaddr = kmap_atomic(bh->b_page);
>> + su = nilfs_sufile_block_get_segment_usage(
>> + sufile, sup->sup_segnum, bh, kaddr);
>> +
>> + if (nilfs_suinfo_update_lastmod(sup))
>> + su->su_lastmod = cpu_to_le64(sup->sup_sui.sui_lastmod);
>> +
>> + if (nilfs_suinfo_update_nblocks(sup))
>> + su->su_nblocks = cpu_to_le32(sup->sup_sui.sui_nblocks);
>> +
>> + if (nilfs_suinfo_update_flags(sup)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Active flag is a virtual flag projected by running
>> + * nilfs kernel code - drop it not to write it to
>> + * disk.
>> + */
>> + sup->sup_sui.sui_flags &=
>> + ~(1UL << NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_ACTIVE);
>> +
>> + cleansi = nilfs_suinfo_clean(&sup->sup_sui);
>> + cleansu = nilfs_segment_usage_clean(su);
>> + dirtysi = nilfs_suinfo_dirty(&sup->sup_sui);
>> + dirtysu = nilfs_segment_usage_dirty(su);
>> +
>> + if (cleansi && !cleansu)
>> + ++ncleaned;
>> + else if (!cleansi && cleansu)
>> + --ncleaned;
>> +
>> + if (dirtysi && !dirtysu)
>> + ++ndirtied;
>> + else if (!dirtysi && dirtysu)
>> + --ndirtied;
>> +
>> + su->su_flags = cpu_to_le32(sup->sup_sui.sui_flags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
>> +
>> + sup = (void *)sup + supsz;
>> + if (sup >= supend)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + prev_blkoff = blkoff;
>> + blkoff = nilfs_sufile_get_blkoff(sufile, sup->sup_segnum);
>> + if (blkoff == prev_blkoff)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* get different block */
>> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
>> + brelse(bh);
>> + ret = nilfs_mdt_get_block(sufile, blkoff, 1, NULL, &bh);
>> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
>> + goto out_mark;
>> + }
>> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
>> + brelse(bh);
>> +
>> + out_mark:
>> + if (ncleaned || ndirtied) {
>> + nilfs_sufile_mod_counter(header_bh, (u64)(long)ncleaned,
>> + (u64)(long)ndirtied);
>
> May I change the type of ncleaned and ndirtied to "long" ?
Sure. Sorry, I misunderstood your last mail on that. I thought you
preferred unsigned long and suggested the arithmetic cast to u64. Shall
I send in a corrected version of the patches?
> Other looks OK to me.
Cool, Thanks.
Best regards,
Andreas Rohner
> Thanks,
> Ryusuke Konishi
>
>> + NILFS_SUI(sufile)->ncleansegs += ncleaned;
>> + }
>> + nilfs_mdt_mark_dirty(sufile);
>> + out_header:
>> + brelse(header_bh);
>> + out_sem:
>> + up_write(&NILFS_MDT(sufile)->mi_sem);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> * nilfs_sufile_read - read or get sufile inode
>> * @sb: super block instance
>> * @susize: size of a segment usage entry
>> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
>> index e84bc5b..366003c 100644
>> --- a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
>> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int nilfs_sufile_set_segment_usage(struct inode *sufile, __u64 segnum,
>> int nilfs_sufile_get_stat(struct inode *, struct nilfs_sustat *);
>> ssize_t nilfs_sufile_get_suinfo(struct inode *, __u64, void *, unsigned,
>> size_t);
>> +ssize_t nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo(struct inode *, void *, unsigned , size_t);
>>
>> int nilfs_sufile_updatev(struct inode *, __u64 *, size_t, int, size_t *,
>> void (*dofunc)(struct inode *, __u64,
>> --
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 8:42 [PATCH v4 1/3] nilfs2: add struct nilfs_suinfo_update and flags Andreas Rohner
[not found] ` <a3342d446fd05205886f48a95905ddc71c35bf44.1391071318.git.andreas.rohner-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-30 8:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] nilfs2: add nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo to update segment usage Andreas Rohner
[not found] ` <f0bf06d2b7d39ebcca3df36567342c7f411eb657.1391071318.git.andreas.rohner-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-31 8:58 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20140131.175825.168035651.konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-31 10:14 ` Andreas Rohner [this message]
[not found] ` <52EB7795.6020407-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-31 10:25 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2014-01-30 8:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] nilfs2: implementation of NILFS_IOCTL_SET_SUINFO ioctl Andreas Rohner
[not found] ` <2e3c9382057dac0835fa45176ccb9f0db9ccc9a8.1391071318.git.andreas.rohner-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-31 9:01 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EB7795.6020407@gmx.net \
--to=andreas.rohner-hi6y0cq0ng0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox