From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiro SEKIBA Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nilfs2: clean up nilfs_write_super Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:00:33 +0900 Message-ID: <87k526qxv2.wl%jir@sekiba.com> References: <1247821968-31232-1-git-send-email-jir@unicus.jp> <1247821968-31232-3-git-send-email-jir@unicus.jp> <20090718.012414.19435380.ryusuke@osrg.net> Reply-To: NILFS Users mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090718.012414.19435380.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: users-bounces-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: NILFS Users mailing list Hi, Thank you for the comments! At Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:24:14 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > The nilfs_update_super() sounds like a function to do update operation > on the super block. > > How about nilfs_sb_need_update() or so? ok, looks better. > And then, this patch has some style problems. Applying checkpatch.pl > can save a bit of time. Grr. I might send the wrong one. I'll revise the patch and resend it again. regards, -- Jiro SEKIBA